The American Historical Review

AHR Home Page
	The Editorial Board The AHR Staff About Us Contact Us
AHA Home Page
University of Chicago Press
Previous Issues (1999–2007)
Electronic Projects
	Electronic Articles Electronic Discussions
Guidelines for Submissions
	Articles Book Reviews Letters to the Editors Applications Copyright Forms

The American Historical Review appears in February, April, June, October, and December of each year. It is the official publication of the American Historical Association (AHA), 400 A Street, S.E., Washington, D.C. 20003 (202-544-2422). It is published by The University of Chicago Press and is printed and mailed by Cadmus Professional Communications, 2901 Byrdhill Road, Richmond, Virginia, 23228. The editorial offices are located at 914 Atwater, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47401.

Explore the latest issue of the AHR online.
Volume 113, Number 2. The April issue contains two articles, a review essay, and an AHR Forum. The articles are both variations on a prevalent theme in our pages, transnational history with an imperial accent; the review essay surveys recent literature on European popular politics in the post–World War II era; and the Forum offers an exchange about a recent book dealing with the past and future of the practice of history. Six featured reviews are followed by our extensive book review section.

AHR 113.2

Cover Illustration: This march with puppets, which took place in Rostock, Germany, in June 2007, was held to protest the Group of Eight (G8) Summit, under way in the nearby city of Heiligendamm. The colorful scene was intended to attract attention to the concerns of the protesters, including environmental and trade issues. While such political demonstrations clearly took place outside as well as within Europe, the Rostock march is representative of informal political protest as it developed in Europe throughout the postwar era. In “What’s Left? Popular Political Participation in Postwar Europe,” Belinda Davis claims that these patterns of popular protest should be better written into the political history of that continent, and that such activity was, over time, critical to the ascendancy of particular “European values.” She notes at the same time that the particularities of postwar European history generated political responses, informally as well as formally, that often represented an uneasy fit with conventional modernist political terminology. Image reproduced courtesy of the San Francisco Bay Area Independent Media Center.

Comments about these articles can be sent to The American Historical Review, 914 E. Atwater Ave., Bloomington, IN 47401, or to our e-mail address: ahr@indiana.edu.

Last Updated 4/25/2008

Webmaster