[2]My description is a highly modified version of one in Holmes and Blow, 1966. By the way, this is a terrific book for those who want to dig into Fourier transforms and the convolution theorems.
[3]See Kraut, 1967 for the computorial uses of Fourier and Laplace transforms as well as proofs of convolution theorem.
[4]which some writers and editors call finessing the reader.
[5]For a technical but readable treatment, see Istratescu, V. I., Fixed Point Theory, Reidel, Dordrecht, Boston and London, 1981.
[6]See DeValois et al, 1979, p. 501.
If you're in Netscape and would like to see an informal discussion of fixed point, go here.
[7]An weird thing happened when I was first trying to scan these moirés for the Internet. At first, they drove both me and the digitizing scanner absolutely nuts. Reflections of the image from the glass face of the scanner were creating their own moirés. "How in heck can I present this critical part of the story," I kept wondering. Basically what I did to get these figures was dampen down the readout. My point of departure, incidentally, was hologramic theory itself.