2. Adobe Acrobat (*.pdf). Pros: The author fully controls the appearance of the document on screen or paper -- it may include graphs, charts, images, even color in addition to text. Free viewers that can display Acrobat documents on the computer screen and print them are available for DOS, Windows, or Mac (for details, click here). Documents are searchable. Cons: Extra software tools (besides a word-processor) are required to generate Acrobat documents, and they are not free.
3. Plain ASCII text (*.asc). Pros: Any word-processor can produce plain ASCII output. Any printer can print it. Anybody can view it on screen. Document is searchable. Cons: Boring, ugly. No formatting is possible except for (e.g.) inserting blank lines between paragraphs.
4. Abstract only, with link to full paper at the author's own site. Pros: The abstract is available on this archive so that people can find out about the paper, and then easily access the complete paper by clicking on its URL. The author can easily put an updated version of the paper in place. The author does not need to maintain a Web site; the paper can be made available by ftp or gopher instead. Cons: (Depend on format--PostScript, Acrobat, or ASCII--in which the author maintains the paper.)
5. Abstract only, author mails hard copy. (The archive contains only a title and abstract, and an interested reader e-mails the author for a hard copy.) Pros: The author fully controls the appearance of the document on paper -- it may include graphs, charts, images, even color in addition to text. No special printer or software required for either author or reader. Cons: Document is not searchable. Extra burden is put on both reader and author to request and mail the document.
Document formats of specific word-processors (*.DOC, *.WP, *.SAM) are not acceptable for the archive.
To submit a link to your home page (or any other web site relevant to social psychology), just e-mail me the URL.