| A105 Human Origins and
Prehistory
A105 Exam 2 Answer Key Best answers to the multiple choice questions
are italicized. The answers given for the short answer questions
are very complete answers -- you don't necessarily have to put in everything
I mention to get full credit. However, they are your most reliable
guide to what I'll be looking for should those questions show up again
on the final :-). Also, I've made notes in purple
on questions that proved to be the most difficult...these questions are
also likely to show up in some form on the final.
A105 Human Origins and Prehistory, Spring 2002
Part I, Multiple Choice. Choose the best answer
to each question. (1 point each.)
2. What social arrangement is not seen in apes?
3. In a female-choice social system like that seen in gorillas,
4. Many primates spend large amounts of time grooming one another.
What would be the most important benefit of this behavior?
5. Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of ape societies?
6. From the material presented in lecture, what would be an accurate
characterization of the language capabilities of chimpanzees and/or bonobos
in language studies?
7. Many primates are known to make and use tools in the wild.
Which primate has the most extensive toolkit in the wild, based on current
knowledge?
8. We talked about differences in hunting strategies among chimpanzees
at Gombe and Tai; Tai chimp hunts are more planned, with Tai chimps cooperating
more in the hunt than seen at Gombe. What explanation did your instructor
give for this difference?
9. Which fossil is thought to be among the earliest apes?
10. Which of the following IS NOT a trend seen in fossil primate
evolution?
11. Which of the following statements is true?
12. Which of the following IS NOT an advantage of bipedalism,
as seen in modern people?
13. Darwin believed that bipedalism evolved after big brains.
What adaptive advantage did he believe bipedalism gave early hominids?
14. What were the first human fossils to be widely accepted?
15. Which of the following is the earliest widely accepted
hominid species?
16. Which is the most recently extinct of the following species
(i.e., which one lived closest to the present)?
17. The Taung fossil
18. Which anatomical feature of Australopithecus afarensis is
the most unusual (and challenging to explain) when compared to both humans
and chimpanzees?
19. How was the bipedalism of Australopithecus afarensis different
from that found in modern humans?
20. Which anatomical feature of Australopithecus afarensis may
suggest that the species retained a substantial amount of arm-hanging in
its behavior?
21. Based on the evidence of sexual dimorphism, what would be
the most likely social system for Australopithecus afarensis?
22. How does Australopithecus africanus differ from Australopithecus
afarensis?
23. The robust australopithecines are considered to have gone
extinct with no descendants alive today. Based on what you know about
their adaptation/lifeway, which of these would be the best explanation
for their extinction?
24. Many morphological features differ between early Homo (habilis,
rudolfensis) and the gracile australopithecines (i.e., A. africanus).
What IS NOT one such difference?
25. Boucher de Perthes was one of the first prehistoric archaeologists.
What did he believe about the stone tools he found?
26. Which site has yielded the oldest stone tools?
27. If you were excavating an Oldowan site, which of these tools
would you NOT expect to find?
28. Based on present evidence, which of these hominids IS NOT
considered a possible candidate to have made the earliest stone tools?
29. Many of the animal bones at Olduvai sites such as FLK Zinj
have stone tool cutmarks in various locations on the bones. Which
ones have been interpreted as indicating disarticulation of carcasses (i.e.,
limb removal)?
30. Which of the following is a conclusion reached from analysis
of Oldowan stone tools?
II. Short Answer. Answer any FIVE (5) of the following seven questions. 2 points each. 1. Choose one aspect of hominid behavior/lifeway that we discussed in class. What does the anatomy of Australopithecus afarensis suggest about its behavior? You may choose any aspect of behavior to focus on (locomotion, social system, diet, etc.) but be sure to back up your behavioral inference with evidence. For this question, you could have answered that the extreme sexual dimorphism
(greater than seen in gorillas) may indicate that A. afarensis lived
in a female choice type social system. You might also have mentioned
A. afarensis' omnivorous diet; evidence for this includes the large
incisors and nuchal area (for biting fruits/stripping) and the relatively
large, thick enameled molars (indicating a hard item component like nuts).
Another option would be to describe some feature of A. afarensis'
locomotor adaptation -- bipedalism and/or some climbing of trees.
Evidence for bipedalism would include the valgus femur, wide pelvis, enlarged
calcaneus, and the Laetoli footprints; evidence for some arboreal behavior
would include the relief on the elbow joint, the angled glenoid fossa on
the scapula, the long, curved fingers, and the long arms in relation to
legs (for details, see the lecture outlines or your notes).
2. Name the two South African australopithecines we’ve discussed in class. The two australopithecines found in South Africa are Australopithecus robustus and Australopithecus africanus. Almost nobody remembered poor Australopithecus africanus! And many of you placed A. boisei and/or A. afarensis in South Africa as well. 3. We discussed the controversy regarding whether early Homo (habilis, rudolfensis) is one species or two. Assume they are two separate species, and give two pieces of evidence that support this conclusion. (Recall, H. habilis is represented mainly by KNM-ER 1813 and OH 62, while H. rudolfensis includes KNM-ER 1470 and 1472.) Some evidence that these are two species includes:
4. Hunt’s postural feeding hypothesis for the evolution of bipedalism asserts that bipedalism began as a postural (not locomotor) adaptation for feeding in small trees. Choose one anatomical feature of A. afarensis we discussed in class (i.e., pelvis shape, knee joint, elbow joint, scapula, torso shape, feet/hands). Briefly describe A. afarensis for that feature, and explain how Hunt’s hypothesis accounts for that feature. Elbow: Relief on the distal humerus is chimplike -- more pronounced projections, giving the joint more stability and suggesting an arboreal component to the adaptation; Hunt's theory suggests this was related to climbing small trees and engaging in arm-hanging bipedal feeding. Scapula: The glenoid fossa is angled up toward the head, as seen in chimps, indicating arm hanging behavior; Hunt's theory suggests that arm hanging for support while feeding bipedally was part of their behavior Torso: Cone shaped, as seen in chimps. This allows for more even distribution of force when hanging by an arm than would be possible with a barrel shaped chest (like ours). Again, this relates to Hunt's idea that arm hanging was part of the bipedalism used by A. afarensis. Hands/feet: The fingers are long and curved, with flexor sheath ridges, indicating a strong grip. Hunt's theory suggests they were gripping small branches while feeding bipedally. The large calcaneus suggests the feet were used to bear weight more than in chimps, suggesting the bipedal standing to feed of the theory. Pelvis: Pelvis is narrow front to back but wider side to side than necessary for childbirth, suggesting that bipedal walking was less efficient than in modern people. Hunt's theory suggests that this width would allow the organs to ride lower in the body, lowering the center of gravity and improving stability when the hominids fed bipedally in small trees. Knee: The femur angles from the hip toward the midline of the body, creating a valgus angle; the proximal tibia is thicker than in chimps (suggesting more weight bearing). This is an indicator of habitual bipedalism; it places the support (feet) beneath the center of mass. Hunt's theory simply suggests that this adaptation occurred for postural feeding and was later refined for locomotion. The main problem in answers to this question was not making clear the connection to Hunt's hypothesis. 5. We discussed a number of primate social systems. Describe one of these systems (name, basic group composition, etc.) and give an example of a modern nonhuman primate that exhibits that system. I won't give a detailed description of the systems here, since that
should be in the outlines and your notes. However, here are some
primate examples for each system:
6. Wild chimpanzees have been observed to use a variety of tools. Name and briefly describe two of these tools. Again, these should be in your notes. Some of the most common answers included nut-cracking stones, ant and termite fishing sticks, leaf sponges, and the use of clubs and branches for display. Several people mentioned stone tools such as choppers and flakes. Although captive bonobos have made these tools, wild chimpanzees are not known to flake stone. 7. Robust and gracile australopithecines are inferred to have had different dietary adaptations based on their teeth and crania. What is this difference, and what evidence (at least one piece of evidence) shows this? Robust australopithecines are inferred to have eaten a hard, rough diet based on their dental proportions (very large molars and smaller incisors suggest the eating of small foods requiring lots of grinding) and the presence of a sagittal crest (for large chewing muscles to attach). Microwear (pits and scratches) on their tooth enamel also resembles microwear experimentally determined to be caused by such foods. Gracile australopithecines probably ate a more omnivorous diet. Their molars are fairly large, but their incisors are larger than seen in the robust australopithecines, indicating that they included some softer foods such as fruits that had to be processed using the incisors; they also lack a sagittal crest, showing that they had smaller chewing muscles and thus probably less emphasis on grinding hard foods than seen in the robust australopithecines. The problems here were either describing the diets but leaving out the evidence, or covering only one kind of australopithecine. III. Short Essay. 5 points. 1. Which theory concerning the evolution of bipedalism do you find the most convincing? Describe that theory, and back up your answer with evidence discussed in class (anatomy of early bipeds, inferred social behavior, probable environment of the first bipeds). 2. FLK Zinj has been a very important site for reconstructing hominid behavior. Specifically, it has been used to make inferences about hominid food-getting practices. Some researchers interpret the faunal and cutmark evidence as indicating both hunting and scavenging, while others interpret this evidence as indicating only very marginal scavenging. Which of these interpretations do you favor? Make an argument for either mostly hunting or mostly scavenging being practiced by the FLK Zinj hominids. Use evidence from readings and lecture in your answer. For both of these questions I was primarily looking for you to take a clear position and back it up with evidence and a reasoned argument; overall, you did quite well. The main problem with both essays was a lack of details in terms of the evidence -- I don't expect you to remember every detail presented in class or provided in the text/outlines, but you should be able to go beyond broad generalizations. In other words, don't just say "The environment changed, making hominids become bipeds," say how it changed, and why this would select for bipedalism; instead of "anatomy shows that A. afarensis was bipedal," include a feature or two that supports this conclusion. However, most of you did a very good job of explaining your reasoning and why you chose your explanations.
URL: http://www.indiana.edu/~a105lh/a105_exam202key..html Contact: lharlack@indiana.edu Copyright 2002, The Trustees of Indiana University |
|