| A105 Human Origins
and Prehistory
A105 Spring 2002 Primate and Early Hominid Skull Activity Station 1: Modern Primates
The male's skull is larger
overall, has a sagittal crest, and has larger canines. These are
examples of sexual dimorphism.
2. Look at the lemur and rhesus macaque skulls. What are their dental formulae? Which one is the most derived? Lemur: 2.1.3.3 Rhesus macaque: 2.1.2.3 The rhesus macaque is more
derived because it has lost a premolar; ancestral primates had additional
premolars, as does the more primitive
3. Compare the rhesus macaque and squirrel monkey. What are some general differences between these animals? Don’t forget the teeth! The squirrel monkey is smaller and has one more premolar; also, it is a New World monkey while the macaque is an Old World monkey. Station 2: Fossil Primates
Some things to note: postorbital
bar but no postorbital closure (no bony orbit); long snout that is located
between the eyes; eye sockets do not face
5. Compare and contrast the cast of Aegyptopithecus (brown cast) with the baboon. How do the teeth differ from the squirrel monkey’s? At first glance, Aegyptopithecus
looks like a smaller version of the baboon
6. Compare and contrast Proconsul and Aegyptopithecus. What derived features are present in Proconsul? Proconsul is larger than
Aegyptopithecus, and has a larger brain. Its canines
Station 3: Australopithecines.
A. africanus has a slightly
smaller brain than robust australopithecines. The biggest difference
has to do with the teeth. Robust australopithecine molars are larger
than africanus molars, and their incisors are smaller, both in overall
size and in relation to the molars. A. africanus also has
a more lightly built face, while robust australopithecines have heavy zygomatics
and dished faces.
2. Compare Australopithecus boisei to the chimpanzee. What differences do you notice, especially in their teeth? Why do you think we observe these differences? A. boisei has a larger brain
and more massive mandible. Its dental proportions are also very different,
with small incisors and huge molars. This indicates a difference
in diet; chimpanzees rely more on slicing and stripping with their incisors
than A. boisei seems to have, and A. boisei relied more on
foods that required more grinding with molars.
3. Look at Australopithecus aethiopicus. What similarity do you notice with the gorilla? What might cause this? A. aethiopicus, like the gorilla, has a sagittal crest. This might indicate a dietary similarity -- or at least, the development of very strong chewing muscles, which attach to the sagittal crest. 4. Are the dental features of the robust australopithecines primitive or derived traits? You may use the chimpanzee skulls for comparison, but remember that these traits are truly being compared to the common ancestor of hominids and chimpanzees. The robust australopithecine dental features are derived traits; they are not seen in chimpanzees and are more extreme than seen in earlier hominids. They are an adaptation to a diet high in foods requiring grinding, such as nuts and seeds. 5. What trends do you see in the morphology of australopithecines through time? Brain size increases in the australopithecine
lineage in general; molar size increases, faces become more robust, and
the nuchal area on the occipital becomes smaller. Robust australopithecine
molars show this trend more than graciles'; robust australopithecines also
have very reduced incisors, and their faces become even more massive than
the graciles', along with their mandibles.
URL: http://www.indiana.edu/~a105lh/a105_primatehominid.html Contact: lharlack@indiana.edu Copyright 2002, The Trustees of Indiana University |
|