|
STUDY
GUIDE 1
NORTH AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY:
TERM LIST/STUDY GUIDE
REVIEW FOR FIRST TAKE-HOME TEST
Just like the beginning
statement in the syllabus, don't let the length of this list intimidate you.
There really is a lot of redundancy built into this.
Think of short definitions and creative ways you would cluster some of
these. Some terms and concepts "comfortably" fit together, while
others don't.
Use the following as a review sheet to test yourself. If you can provide a
definition and example of each of the following terms and concepts, you are in
good shape. Use this to try to test yourself (before I test you!).
During review
we will definitely disqualify some of these (i.e. they won't be on your test.). I encourage you to work with one another on these terms and the "class
telephone book" should help.
* * * * * * * *
- NORTH AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY AND NATIVE CULTURE AREAS: A HISTORICAL BACKDROP
TO THE DISCIPLINE:
- Culture area: concept and history
- Otis Mason:
- Clark Wissler:
- "Food Areas"
- Franz Boas
- Boazian anthropological tradition and it's influence on American
archaeology? - discuss and distinguish cultural anthropological from
archaeological implications
- Culture area concept: pros and cons?
- Culture areas and ecological implications
- Culture areas and museology?
- The "Age-Area Theory"
- "Trait lists"
- Major North American archaeological areas: location, characteristics
- Arctic Culture Area: location, characteristics
- Subarctic Culture Area: location, characteristics
- Plateau Culture Area: location, characteristics
- Northwest Coast Culture Area: location, characteristics
- California Culture Area: location, characteristics
- Great Basin Culture Area: location, characteristics
- Southwest Culture Area: location, characteristics
- Great Plains (or Plains) Culture Area: location, characteristics
- Eastern Woodlands Culture Area: location, characteristics
- Northeast Culture Area: location, characteristics
- Southeast Culture Area: location, characteristics
- Mesoamerican Culture Area: location, characteristics
- Circum-Caribbean Culture Area: location, characteristics
- SETTING THE ENVIRONMENTAL STAGE: THE PLEISTOCENE SCENE:
- The "cultural staging
area in Asia"
- Impact of the Cold War on our understanding of peopling of the Americas:
discuss
- The concept of a "Cultural
filter"
- Ecological settings of Northeast Asia and the Americas during the
Pleistocene:
- When during the major
glaciations of the Pleistocene could the Beringia "Gateway" have been open?
- Glacial eustatics - what this refers to and relevance to this discussion
- Global precipitation budget - define the concept and show relevance to
this discussion
- Beringia: what is it? where? how extensive?
- The "Ice-Free Corridor"
- Pleistocene coastal migration — discuss and critique
- Circumstantial evidence for water craft in Pleistocene times? _ discuss
evidence for this
- Pleistocene megafauna - define and provide examples from various parts of
the Americas
- Probiscidians - what are these?
- Cameloids - discuss relevance to ancient Americas
- Eohippus - what is this?
- The giant sloth - where found? Describe
- Pleistocene extinctions - define
- The "Paul S. Martin Hypothesis" -
define and critique of
- Archaeological sites in periglacial areas
- Sites of early humans in the New World:
- Karst topography - describe and note peculiar characteristics
- Lagoa Santa site, Brazil
- the "Lagoa Santa Calotte"
- Soumidouro Cave site, Brazil
- Pedra Farada site - where roughly is it and describe its relevance to this
discussion
- Calico Hills site, California
- Controversies associated with Calico Hills site?
- San Diego site, California
- Santa Rosa Island site, California
- Meadowcroft Rock Shelter site, Pennsylvania
- Tlapacoya site, Mexico
- the "Bone of Tequixquiac"
- Valsequillo site, Puebla
- Tepexpan site - location and significance
- Lessons to be learned from the Tepexpan excavation! - discuss
- Santa Isabel Ixtapan site - location and significance
- Old Crow Flats site, Northwest Territories
- Pleistocene fauna hunted
- Monte Verde site: nature of it and implications?
- Tom Dillahay - who is this?
- Anaerobic conditions - what is this? Why is it relevant to archaeological
questions?
- Film: The Early Americans (main content and criticisms of it?)
- THEORIES ON THE EARLIEST COLONISTS:
- "New World"
- the "Age of Discovery"
- "Indian": origins and
significance of term
- Bernal Diaz del Castillo
- Encomienda
- Agendas of encomenderos and the Church in Spanish colonial America
- compare and contrast
- Fray Bartolome de las Casas
- The Papal Bull of Pope Paul III - what relevance?
- Fray Jose de Acosta
- Historia Natural y Moral de las Indias
- Thomas Gage
- "Giant Jewish Toltec Vikings" -
(?) Refers to what?
- Mormonism and the peopling of the New World - discuss their position
- THE ARCTIC AND SUBARCTIC: ESKIMOS, ATHABASKANS, AND ALGONQUINS. AND THEIR
ANCESTORS:
- The Arctic: geographically and ecologically defined
- The Arctic: potentially exploitable resources (for early humans)
- The Arctic: early cultural traditions:
- The Arctic: Paleoarctic tradition
- The Arctic: Microblade or Small Tool Tradition: characteristic artifacts
- The Arctic: Onion Portage Site: significance
- The Arctic: Ipiutak Site: characteristics
- The Arctic: Thule Culture or Tradition characteristics and impact (growth of
and movements) of them
- Dorset (800 B.C.) to now
- Thule came in too
- Don't forget the Norse in Greenland!
- The Arctic: Bering Sea Culture
- The Arctic: Artistic crafts and creativity of: Ipiutak; Old Bering Sea
- The Subarctic: geographically and ecologically defined
- The Subarctic: Potentially exploitable resources (for humans):
- The Subarctic: early cultural traditions for the east versus the west:
- The Subarctic: Athabascan versus Algonquin
- The Western Subarctic: "Athabascan Prehistory":
is it appropriate? why?
- The Western Subarctic: Basic cultural (technological) developmental
sequence: Microblades to: polished stone to: ethnographic record
- The Western Subarctic: General boreal adaptive pattern and culture:
(subsistence, social organization, material culture, etc.)
- The Eastern Subarctic: some characteristics of the distribution patterns of
Athabascan versus Algonquin: implications?
- The Eastern Subarctic: instances of regional specializations: The Eastern
Subarctic: 3 branches or traditions that emerged out of the Paleoindian
peoples (earliest ones):
- Shield Archaic:
- Boreal Archaic:
- Maritime Archaic:
- The Eastern Subarctic: Port aux Chois Site: inventory and cultural
implications
- The Eastern Subarctic: cultural tree (general):
- Paleoindian to:
- Archaic (with subsequent regional specializations) to:
- Ethnographic Algonquin Indians (Beothuk, Cree, Ojibwa, etc.)
- THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST AND THE PLATEAU:
- The Plateau: Geographically and ecologically defined:
- The Plateau: Major rivers and their drainage systems:
- The Plateau: Geological history and possible implications for archaeology?
- The Plateau: the Scablands: significance?
- The Plateau: Columbia River versus the Fraser River Canyon versus the Snake
River (as cultural tradition dividers?)
- The Plateau: "Northwest Riverine Tradition" -
meaning?
- The Plateau: Chronological cultural sequencing:
- The Plateau: Paleoplateau
= "Old Cordilleran"
- The Plateau: Characteristics of fully developed Plateau culture
(archaeologically):
- The Plateau: Characteristic subsistence?
- Harder Phase in the Inland Plateau
- Congden Phase (the Dalles)
- The Plateau: Ground-stone objects: types, characteristics, significance?
- The Plateau: Steatite and slate sculptures (e.g., zoomorphs): significance?
- The Plateau: Salmon: importance of? locations of?
- The Plateau: Importance
of discussions of "boreal traits":
- Salish-speaking peoples: possible archaeological significance?
- Northwest Coast: Geographically and ecologically defined:
- The Strait of Georgia Tradition chronology
- Characterization of Marpole Phase lifestyle and artifact inventory
- Northwest Coast: characteristic subsistence patterns and resource bases
- Northwest Coast: the Ozette Site: description? significance?
- Northwest Coast: the Ozette Site: anything unique about the kinds of
excavations done there?
- Northwest Coast: Characteristic artifacts and general material culture:
- Northwest Coast: Ethnohistorical considerations
- Northwest Coast: Metals in prehistory and possible ways of accounting for
their presence?
- Northwest Coast: Possible
cultural "debt" to - adjacent Alaskan
and Plateau cultures?
- Commonalities of ground-stone slate technologies: Don Dumand versus Dean
Snow - the argument?
- Kodiak Island, Salish, and ground-stone technological transfer in ancient
times - elaborate on
- Be able to discuss why it makes sense to discuss both the Inland Plateau and
the Northwest Coast as a related unit
- Be able to provide a comparative cultural description of lifestyles of the
Harder Phase (Inland Plateau), Congden II (the Columbia River Dalles), and
Marpole Phase (Strait of Georgia)
- A prehistoric Northern
Pacific "Community"? evidence? pros and
cons?
- Film: Northwest Coast Indians
- PREHISTORIC PEOPLES OF CALIFORNIA:
- California: "the Land of Fruits and Nuts"-
a cliché? or
more to this?
- California: Geographically and ecologically defined:
- California: Characteristic subsistence for northwest California?
- California: Characteristic subsistence for central California?
- California: Acorns - the related systems of this food source
- California: Prehistoric characteristic artifacts:
- California: Prehistoric "external relationships"?
- California: as providing
example of "optimum habitats"?
- California: Main languages spoken?
- California: Linguistic diversity as reflection of what?
- California: Hokan languages - significance?
- California: Windmiller Culture
- California: Canalièo
Culture
- California: Ethnohistoric and ethnographic peoples as descendants of
prehistoric peoples?
- California: Characteristic artifact inventories?
- California: Ethnographic and linguistic picture
* * * * * * *
Hopefully, this will be more than enough short IDs for this first
test! Given that this study guide is being created on Thursday, February 14,
2002 we'll see how far we get by the 27th.
This take-home test will involve 2 sections: essay and short
identification. Your term list may be consulted to complete this test. You
may use virtually any source to answer your questions except any other
students in this class once the final question choices have been made.
Consider the following to be the full range of possible essay questions for
this exam. Use this to prepare for the test in any way you see fit. If you have
digested the term/concept list you received last week, you are already ahead _
In your essays and short identifications remember that I have no way of
knowing what you have in your head about a particular subject. The questions are
designed to be as straightforward as possible and do not contain any intentional
tricks. I want to know what you know. Your job is to convince me (by writing a
brief; concise essay) that you have digested the material and can use it.
You will be required to answer two of the following essays. You will not know
which ones until I announce them following our review. I will choose one of
them and you will choose the other (each essay worth 25 points). You will be
given 5 short answer questions. Each ID will be worth 10 points and will be
taken directly from your term list. They should amount to nothing more than one
or two line definitions. For the take-home portion of the exam, I will choose
three and you will choose the remaining two of your choice.
One word to the wise!
You
will be given quite a lot of time to complete this take-home examination.
This means that you should approach
answering these questions in a substantial manner. Length of responses to
individual essays clearly varies depending upon the question and your ability
at being concise. Frankly, it is not uncommon for me to get back take-homes
such as
these that may be at least 5 to 6 pages in length (often word processed!). Word
processing or typing is up to you, but your
returned exams should be neat, legible, well organized, and should be
strengthened with examples to strengthen your case. Remember, I can only grade
what you give me to read! I am not clairvoyant and you should not expect me to "read in" what
you don't actually tell me.
* * * * * * *
PART 1: ESSAYS
(25 points possible for each)
-
Consider the traditional cultural area approach to North American prehistory.
Culture areas are the primary organizational headings. Consider what we have
used thus far: the Arctic, the Subarctic, the Plateau, the Northwest Coast, and
California. Are such headings appropriate? If not, offer an alternative or
reworking of the existent approach that would more appropriately suggest
significant cultural dynamic headings. Provide compelling examples. (Note!, this
may not seem as easy at it appears on the surface.)
-
We have discussed the
concept of "Culture Area" in terms of its
historical origins (the term) and also from a methodological angle (e.g., what
does the term mean and of what use is it as an explanatory concept - tool -
to us?).
Write an essay that:
(A) Defines the
concept of "culture area
(B) Discusses the history of the term
(C) Discusses how the concept has been reflected in the development of
archaeological approaches in North America.
-
On various occasions
we spent some time discussing generalities about the cultural transformations
that occurred as a result of changes following the
Pleistocene. In Europe the general term that chronologically and culturally ties
into this is "Mesolithic" and in North America the preferred term is
"Archaic."
Write an essay discussing the nature of such cultural transformations and
suggest what dynamics contributed to such changes.
-
While we can point
to various forms of evidence, derived primarily from archaeology, that
address the origins of the earliest Native Americans (or,
following the Canadian preferential terminology, the "First Nations").
Prior to the emergence of anthropological archaeology other sources of evidence
were put forth. It was suggested that the initial (i.e. 16th century Renaissance
European) understandings of what and who Native American peoples were must be
understood within the particular cultural context of the times.
Write an essay outlining the nature
of the earliest European perceptions of what and who these people were. How did
their definition by Europeans reflect the
agendas of the times? What were these agendas? What were the issues? What were
the controversies engendered? How were they resolved?
-
We spent a considerable
amount of time discussing the issues surrounding the earliest peopling
of the New World. This involved setting both the cultural and
ecological (e.g., climatological, biological, geographical) "stage" for the areas
of east and northeast Asia and for the northwestern portion of
North America.
Write an essay describing:
(A) What were the cultural factors present in east and northeast Asia leading up
to the initial migration to the New World and,
(B) What were the significant ecological variables that were emphasized in this
process
-
Describe in general
terms what was the impact on global climatic patterns of the Pleistocene
cooling period. Go beyond the obvious fact that there were
glacial masses that spread in much of the northern hemisphere. In your
discussion use the illustration provided by our discussion of "normal" versus
Pleistocene global moisture/precipitation budgets to look at areas beyond those
that were directly under glaciation. What kinds of implications can you
derive that would be of interest to archaeologists?
-
What were the factors
that made some of the earliest sites controversial (e.g., Old Crow Flats,
Lagoa Santa [and/or Soumidouro], Calico Hills)? In your
essay consider issues such as stratigraphy, deposition, dating, relative "survivability" of
data, etc. Note, that in some respects this essay involves more general archaeological
theory than just specifics on a single
site.
-
Discuss the prehistory of Arctic archaeological culture area by addressing
the following:
(A) Briefly describing the ecological variables posed by the Arctic
environment
(B) What is the nature of archaeological preservation and research there
(C) What is the impact such environmental conditions had on human cultural
developments there
(D) What were some of the environmental pros and cons posed to the prehistoric
peoples of the Arctic?
-
Discuss the prehistory of Subarctic archaeological culture area by
addressing the following:
(A) Briefly describing the ecological variables posed
by the Subarctic environment,
(B) What is the nature of archaeological preservation and research there
(C) What is the impact such environmental conditions had on human cultural
developments there
(D) What were some of the environmental pros and cons posed to the prehistoric
peoples of the Arctic?
-
While one may generalize about the Arctic environment, it is nonetheless
true that there arose a series of cultural traditions there. Generally, trace
the cultural developments of the Arctic area by making reference to technology
types and how these changed over time. Provide speculation on how such changing
technologies reflected changes in resource orientation.
-
Briefly describe the Subarctic culture area and how it has been defined.
Defend the rationale for subdividing this area into the Eastern versus the
Western Subarctic. What distinguishes the two Subarctic subareas?
-
Roughly, where and
what is the Port aux Chois site? What is its significance for our understanding
of Subarctic prehistory? This asks you to be
familiar with the kinds of things recovered from the site and the interpretive
implications that can be drawn from them. What about this site can be related
to
issues of the "Red-Paint People?"
-
Consider the Thule Tradition. What part did it play in the prehistoric
picture of the Arctic, the Subarctic, and Alaska? What was their history and
with whom (e.g., with what groups) did they come in contact in these areas? In
other words, demonstrate why our understanding of the prehistoric cultural
dynamics of those areas would be incomplete without making reference to them.
-
The Eskimos (the IŻuit)
are generally considered relative late-corners. Describe what you would
archaeologically expect that would indicate their having
been at a site you are excavating. This should involve both characteristic
artifacts and some references to physical anthropological characteristics.
Defend or refute the idea that our understanding of the prehistoric cultural
dynamics of the interior Plateau and the Northwest Coast cannot be complete
without understanding the archaeological record of the southwest and south coast
of Alaska.
In your discussion make reference to specific archaeological data and specific
cultural traditions.
Briefly characterize the ecological factors
present in the interior Plateau environment. This area is drained by the
Columbia and Fraser rivers. How did the riverine drainage system affect the
trajectory of human cultural developments in the Plateau area? What aspects of
the Columbia River system should be considered by archaeologists interested in
the earliest peoples of the area?
-
The prehistoric cultures
of the Northwest Coast are considered to have cultural "debts" to peoples
in adjoining regions—namely the peoples of the Kodiak Tradition and
the peoples of the Plateau. Compare and contrast the
archaeological information on the Kodiak and Plateau peoples and defend or
refute the suggestion that they were instrumental in the development of the
Northwest Coast cultural tradition.
-
Consider the development
of the characteristic Northwest Coast ground-stone technology (and art).
Suggest routes and points of origin for this
tradition and possible cultural dynamic factors that might have been involved
(Do it this way to avoid just saying, "It diffused from point X to
point X.").
-
Compare and contrast the nature of what we know
about Northwest Coast culture from the archaeological (e.g. Ozette - note
this was discussed in the film) versus the ethnographic record. Are there
environmental factors that are unique to the Northwest Coast that have
anything to do with this question? If so, how so?
Reflect, digest, synthesize, and perhaps
"deconstruct"(?) some of what we have as a legacy of Columbus'
voyage. One area in particular involves the idea that the Americas are
somewhat of a laboratory example of the emergence of cultures completely
in isolation from the rest of the world.
-
Write an essay that
questions this idea; that emphasizes the idea that it might be more appropriate
to look at the far
northern Pacific rim as having been an area more of "community" rather than
as having been absolutely separated. Furthermore, in your essay attempt to
go beyond the obvious connection of the ancestral peoples having
originally migrated across the Bering Land Bridge some time during the
Pleistocene. Employ specific examples in your essay.
-
California prehistory may best be appreciated by
considering what we know about the ethnohistoric and ethnographic aboriginal
populations there. Discuss what archaeological data would best be explained
by using California ethnohistoric, ethnographic, and linguistic information.
* * * * * * *
PART 2: SHORT IDENTIFICATIONS: (10 points possible each)
(ID#1) ___________________________________________________
(ID#2) ___________________________________________________
(ID#3) ___________________________________________________
(ID#4) ___________________________________________________
(ID#5) ___________________________________________________
* * * * * * *
BE SURE AND REMEMBER THE
FOLLOWING:
- A general rule for
taking Skip's tests - rely on your notes from class and do not depend
on being able to find sufficient answers on
the Web! While the InterNet often has great information - often useful in
part of your responses - chances are that a different "spin" was
given during class that will be expected in your test write-ups.
- PLAGIARISM - This means "cheating" and
cheating can mean getting information from others in the class. It is also
considered cheating
if you cut and paste directly from the Web. What I want to know is what YOU
know, not how well you can make a collage! Cheating will not be tolerated!
- Given that this exam is a take-home test, you will have sufficient time to
organize your essays and short ID. and write them clearly! Don't
assume that I know what is in your head. Don't be vague. I can only know
what you've written for me in the essays I read.
- Handing in a test that
is rapidly hand-written on just 2 sheets of paper will probably not be
sufficient. At the same time, I am not
expecting lengthy "term papers" for your answers.
- You are at liberty to use your notes and any other readings you have done
to assist you in your write-ups, but, if you do use them be sure to
indicate credit due!
This means that you should include appropriate referencing in your
answers (if you are clearly borrowing ideas or information).
If you just sit down and write up your essays and IDs from memory you
should not feel you have to reference.
Once you begin your test DO NOT ASK OTHER STUDENTS ABOUT TEST QUESTIONS.
Finally - Be sure to
put your name on your test and clearly label it "TEST 1."
* * * * * * *
|