Procedures at IU Bloomington

II. Student Disciplinary Procedures

A. Academic Misconduct
Step Two: Appealing the Finding of Misconduct and/or the Academic Sanction
  1. Within fourteen (14) calendar days of receiving the Dean of Students notice concerning misconduct, the student may appeal the finding of misconduct, the particular sanction imposed, or both.
  2. The appeal must be submitted in writing to the dean of the school in which the alleged offense occurred. The dean notifies the Office of the Dean of Students of the appeal.
  3. If an appeal is filed, the dean talks with the student and faculty member, either separately or together, at the dean’s discretion. If the matter is not resolved within 10 days of talking with the student and faculty member, the dean convenes a hearing board composed of three (3) faculty and two (2) students.
  4. The board holds a hearing on the issue(s) raised by the student. If the student appealed the finding that misconduct occurred, the board determines whether clear and convincing evidence supports the finding of misconduct. If the board concludes that the evidence does not support a finding of misconduct, the matter ends there. If the board finds that misconduct occurred, and the student has appealed the academic sanction imposed, the board may uphold or reduce that sanction. If the student has only appealed the sanction, the board decides only whether to uphold or reduce the sanction.
  5. The board issues a written decision within fourteen (14) calendar days after the hearing ends. The decision sets out the board’s conclusions and the findings of fact and reasoning supporting those conclusions. The presiding officer of the board sends the decision to the dean of the unit, with copies to the student, the faculty member, the Dean of Students, and the dean of the unit in which the student is enrolled (if different from the unit in which the misconduct occurred).
  6. Units may, at their discretion, develop procedures (including timeframes) for addressing a student’s claim that after the conclusion of the unit board hearing s/he has identified new evidence that reasonably would affect a misconduct finding and/or academic sanction.