Some years ago Elliot Friedman wrote that the "introduction of comparison
into the analysis of public policy promises to explore the range of
choice available to societies whose perception of choice may be bounded
by institutions, economics, social structure and culture...and it
promises to be an embracing theory for politics, as well as policy,
because comparison helps establish norms for judgment and helps
distinguish the essential from the trivial."  The general task of this
seminar is to explore the feasibility of these promises and to consider
ways in which they might be maximized.

We will approach this task from four interrelated directions.  First, we
will consider separately the concepts "comparison" and "public policy."
This discussion leads, secondly, to an exploration of the relationship
between institutions and action with a concentration on "theories" of the
state and on public/rational choice.  This exploration, thirdly, will be
conducted with reference to the issue of comparative social policy and
the politics/policies of  "school choice".  Finally, we will raise a
couple of issues of general concern to political and policy analysis
focusing on the "practicality" of  "policy knowledge."

Readings will include Giandomenico Majone, Evidence, Argument and
Peersuasion in the Policy Process; Elinor Estrum, Governing the Commons;
Charles Ragin, The Comparative Method; Charles Tilly, Big Structures,
Large Processes, Huge Comparisons; and Alan Wolfe, Whose Keeper? Social
Science and Moral Obligation.  Assignments will include the preparation
and presentation of "research questions"; writing a couple of short
papers; and a choice between a seminar paper or a final examination aka a
"mock prelim".

I would be happy to discuss details with anyone potentially interested in
the seminar.