Course Portfolio Workshop, August 14th, 2001

Time*

Main Themes

Parallel Program

2:00–2:40pm

Welcome and Introduction—Simon Brassell
(Dogwood Tree Suite)

  • Introduction to Course portfolio project at IU
  • Aims and format of workshop; introduction of participants
  • “Problems and Challenges: Examples in Introductory Oceanography”
  • Distribution of materials for one-on-one conversations

 

2:45–3:45pm

One-on-One Conversations about Problems and Challenges
(Dogwood Tree Suite)

  • Preparation of statement about the nature of three problems or challenges:
    • definition and description of the problems or challenges
    • what creates them? are they generated in class, by the course materials, or as a preconception?
    • what efforts or approaches may help to resolve or remedy them? 
    • what other strategies could be employed?
    • how could they become focal points within a course portfolio?
  • Prepare succinct statement of particular problems and plans for resolution, with copy for partner 

 

One-on-One Conversations about Course Portfolios For Newcomers
(Redbud Tree Suite)

  • Preparation of a one-page draft outline of your course portfolio, comprising:
    • record personal information: name, rank, department
    • note class profile: level, size, place in curriculum, etc.
    • document course contents, teaching strategies, assessment methods, problems and challenges, etc.
    • prepare statement about fundamental teaching goal that will be addressed in the course portfolio
  • Complete one-page poster

 

3:50–4:30pm

Plenary Discussion: Reflections on Problems and Challenges
(Dogwood Tree Suite)

  • Discussion of the types of Problems and Challenges encountered
  • Discussion of examples by partners based on conversations and directed toward:
    • sharing of experiences in the nature of challneges in teaching
    • recognition of common problems and strategies for resolution
    • how these issues could be presented in a course portfolio

 

*We are anxious to stimulate and facilitate discussions so these approximate timings represent guidelines, rather than rigid contraints on the program plan