Topic V - Short Answer Questions
1.Complete the following table:
Qx TUx MUx
0 0
1 1000 1000
2 1800 800
3 2100 300
4 2180 80
2. Complete the following table:
Qx TUx MUx
0 0
1 0 0
2 100 100
3 100 0
4 180 80
Can you think of any goods that might lead to such a strange set of
preferences? Goods that only have usefulness in pairs such as shoes.
3. If total utility from good X were to reach a maximum and then start
to decline for additional units of good X, what would this imply about
the marginal utility from additional units of good X? Make up a numerical
example to show this.
It would imply a negative marginal utility - example
Qx TUx MUx
1 100
100
2 160
60
3 170
10
4 140
-30
4 100
-40
4. Assume Z is a complement to good X, and Y is a substitute for good
X. Also assume Joe Brown is currently maximizing utility with respect
to consumption of each of these goods. What might we expect to happen to
Joe Brown's purchases of X, Y, and Z if the price of good X falls? Why?
If Joe is maximizing then the equal marginal rule is satisfied -- MUx/Px
= Muy/PY = Muz/Pz. If the price of good X falls, then the MUx/Px increases.
This would lead Joe to buy more X. If Joe buys more of X, then he buys
more of Z because Z is a complement to X and he buys less of Y, since X
is a substitute for Y.
5. Assume Z is a complement to good X, and Y is a substitute for good
X. Also assume Joe Brown is currently maximizing utility with respect to
consumption of each of these goods. What might we expect to happen to Joe
Brown's purchases of X, Y, and Z if Joe's income increases from $1,000.
per month to $1,500 per month? Why? State precisely what assumptions your
answer depends upon.
If Joe is maximizing then the equal marginal rule is satisfied -- MUx/Px
= MUy/PY = MUz/Pz and Joe's purchases of X, Y, and Z adds up to $1000 per
month. When Joe's income increase the equal marginal rule is still satisfied,
but he is not spending all of his income. What we know is that Joe will
buy more of goods that are normal goods and less of goods that are inferior
goods. In this case we know that Joe will buy more of some of these goods,
but without knowing what is normal and what is inferior - we can't say
more. Except, we can say if he buys more X, he will buy more Z; and if
he buys less X, he will buy less Z.