|
This material may be copied only for noncommercial classroom teaching purposes, and only if this source is clearly cited. |
|
|
|
![]() |
A Mini-LessonThe Checks LabOriginal version for ENSI '92 by This Version by Judy Loundagin |
|
SYNOPSIS |
Each team has an envelope containing a series of bank checks. A few are removed at a time, and the team attempts to construct a plausible scenario which involves those checks. With each subsequent removal of checks, appropriate revision of the scenario is done. Final scenarios are compared by the class. Class discussion is designed to show how human values and biases influence observation and interpretation, even in science. This is one of the few nature-of-science lessons which have a biological connection. |
CONCEPTS |
1. Scientific knowledge is uncertain, tentative and subject to revision. 2. Scientific explanations and interpretations can neither be proven nor disproven with certainty. 3. Scientists use a variety of criteria to compare explanations and select the better ones. 4. Human values deeply influence science (its terminology, the questions asked, and the criteria used for choosing among theories). |
MATERIALS |
1. A series of checks in an envelope (1 envelope per
team) The following items can be seen and copied by clicking on its title; to return here, press the "Back" button on your browser: 2. Student Information Sheet for each team (says "...pull 4 checks...") 3. Worksheet for tentative hypotheses and questions to answer. 5. Overhead Instructions
(2nd version: says "...pull 3 checks...") |
||||||
STUDENT HANDOUTS |
1. A series of checks in an envelope (1 envelope per team) 2. (optional) Student Information Sheet for each team 3. (optional) Worksheet for tentative hypotheses and questions to answer. |
||||||
TEACHING STRATEGY |
SAMPLE SCENARIO: See excellent article by Dr. Laura Henriques "Theoretically Speaking." The value and strategy of using the Checks lab (and similar experiences) as a recognizable metaphor for the process of historical science is very well done. TIMING: This lesson is best used in your Nature of Science unit, preferably at the beginning of your course. If you used something else to convey the concepts listed above, then this lesson could be done later in the year as a little "something different" break, to reinforce those concepts. MATERIALS PREP: All materials are available in PDF format. Just click on the appropriate items in bold print below to reach the PDF pages; press the "Back" button on your browser to return to this lesson page. We have two versions of this activity available here. Judy
Loundagin's version is the most complete and structured: A second version, developed by Leslie Hays and Paul
Loozen, with: Instructions
for the Overhead, and one set of checks: NOTE: WE RECOMMEND THAT YOU NOT USE THESE CHECKS, BUT RATHER, DOWNLOAD THE "NEW ADDITION" HIGH RESOLUTION CHECKS BELOW. NEW ADDITION, MAY 2005:
SET B: 16 checks: 4 checks/sheet; WITH check numbers
SET C: 17 checks on 3 sheets; NO check numbers
1. Download and print enough copies of the checks so you will
have one set of 16 (or 17) different checks for each team (of
3-4). Cut them apart and put each set into an envelope. The entire
collection of envelopes can be re-used in each subsequent period,
or, if you desire, you can use different sets of checks for each
period: The sharpness of these checks may be less than desired, due to the limitations of digital rendering required by this medium. They ARE usable, but if you would prefer sharper hard copies (from the originals), just email the webmaster with your request and address, and they will be mailed to you ASAP. 2. Run off copies of the Student Information Sheet (Introduction and Directions) and the Worksheet, if desired. You could use one copy of each for each team, or for each student. This entire lab can be done easily using oral instructions, but the structured material may be the way to go if this is your first experience with this material, especially with the questions used. 3. Follow the Procedure with the Teacher Notes. Item 7 is most vital. Be sure to allow ample time for the discussion. As for the number of checks to draw each time (3-4), use your judgment; try 3 in one period, 4 in another; then do whichever works best. 4. It shouldn't go unnoticed that some of the checks bring a biological slant to this experience, with checks written to hospitals, mortuaries, AIDS funds, and drunk driving concerns. This makes this one of the few nature-of-science lessons with a biological relevance (a bit of a stretch, but noteworthy)! (1 page, in PDF format, for easy printout) EXTENSIONS AND VARIATIONS: 2. A second activity is built around a structured comparison of the relative strengths of different scientific ideas (theories). Click on "Is Evolution Weak Science, Good Science, or Great Science?", and TRY it! 3. A similar lesson to this Checks Lab is The Great Fossil Find, already on this site. It could be used instead of the Checks Lab, or in addition to it (at a later date, as reinforcement of the concepts, in an appropriate context). The Laetoli Trackway Puzzle lesson also provides an engaging experience, analyzing 3.4 million year old footprints. 4. There are many elements of science in crime scene investigations (CSI), or forensic science, and, as in the Checks Lab, there are many ways to incorporate this exciting field in your Nature of Science efforts. Two lessons on our site that do this well are the Crime Scene Scenario, and Crime Against Plants. Try it. And an excellent online resource for all sorts of ideas and materials can be found on Eric Rude's site: "Sources of Forensic Information and Supplies." 5. A nice alternative activity can utilize a sampling of the same set of checks used in this lesson in an interactive online mode on the PBS-Evolution site: "The Check Mystery". 6. MYSTERY BOXES: Try this other excellent and very popular lesson which, as presented here, embodies many of the same elements as the Checks Lab. Makes a good alternative to the Checks Lab. |
ATTRIBUTIONSome of the ideas in this lesson may have been adapted from earlier, unacknowledged sources without our knowledge. If the reader believes this to be the case, please let us know, and appropriate corrections will be made. Thanks. |
1. Original Source: a Social Studies activity source unknown) 5. Preliminary approval for ENSIweb by: M. Nickels, C. Nelson, J. Beard: 12/15/97 6. Edited / Revised for ENSIweb by L. Flammer 2/2000 |
|
CONTACT THE WEBMASTER |
Return to Top of Page Home Return to List of Lessons