Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical data analysis. NY: John Wiley & Sons. [cited]
Baglivo, J., Olivier, D., & Pagano, M. (1988). Methods for the analysis of contingency tables with large and small cell counts. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1006-1013. Boettcher, W. A. (1995). Context, methods, numbers, and words: Prospect theory in international relations. Journal of Conflict resolution, 39, 561-583. Bradley, R. A. & Terry, M. E. (1952). Rank analysis of incomplete block designs. I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 39, 324-345. Budescu, D.V., Weinberg, S., & Wallsten, T.S. (1988). Decisions based on numerically and verbally expressed uncertainties. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 281-292. Clark, H. H. (1990). Comment on AQuantifying probabilistic expressions.@ Statistical Science, 5, 12-16. Cox, M. A. A. & Plackett, R. L. (1980). Small samples in contingency tables. Biometrika 67, 1-13. Flury, B. (1997). A first course in multivariate statistics. NY: Springer-Verlag. Gulliksen, H. (1956). A least squares solution for paired comparisons with incomplete data. Psychometrika, 21, 125-134. Mehta, C. R. & Patel, N. R. (1983). A network algorithm for performing Fisher's exact test in r*c contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 427-434. Mehta, C. R., Patel, N. R., & Senchaudhuri, P. (1988). Importance sampling for estimating exact probabilities in permutational inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 999-1005. Mosteller, F. & Youtz, C. (1990). Quantifying probabilistic expressions. Statistical Science, 5, 2-34. Ness, M. E. (1995). Ordinal positions and scale values of probability terms as estimated by three methods. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 28, 152-161. Pagano, M. & Halvorsen, K. T. (1981). An algorithm for finding the exact significance levels of r*c contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Peng, C. Y. J. & Bolte, J. (1992). Context effects influencing the restatement of numeric probabilities (Final Report submitted to the Marry Higgins Proffitt and Maris M. Proffitt Endowment). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University. Reagan, R. T., Mosteller, F., & Youtz, C. (1989). Quantitative meanings of verbal probability expressions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 433-442. Robinson, D. H. & Levin, J. R. (1997). Reflections on statistical and substantive significance, with a slice of replication. Educational Researcher, 26, 21-26. Tanur, J. M. (1990). On the possible dangers of isolation. Statistical Science, 5, 21-22. Tavana, M., Kennedy, D. T., & Mohebbi, B. (1997). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10, 133-150. Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 273-286. Torgerson, W. S. (1958). Theory and methods of scaling. NY: John Wiley & Sons. Wallsten, T. S. & Budescu, D. V. (1990). Comment on AQuantifying probabilistic expressions.@ Statistical Science, 5, 23-26. Wallsten, T. S., Budescu, D. V., Rapoport, A., Zwick, R., & Forsyth, B. (1986). Measuring the vague meanings of probability terms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 348-365. Wallsten, T. S., Budescu, D. V., Zwick, R., & Kemp, S. M. (1993). Preferences and reasons for communicating probabilistic information in verbal or numerical terms. Bulletin of The Psychonomic Society, 31, 135-138.