The third, which is the largest and most interesting, is
situated on the highest point of a bold headland, overlooking the
main river, three miles southeast of Brookville, on its eastern
bank, and separating the river valley from that of Little Cedar
Creek. This hill, which has long been known as "Brown's Hill,"
form the fact that a squatter by the name of Brown lived at its
base at an early day, is of an oval base about one-half mile in
length, its longer axis running north and south. It is joined at
its northern extremity to the main ridge which separates the two
valleys before mentioned. At its juncture with the main hill it
is scarcely one hundred feet in height, but rises gradually in
the form of a ridge, affording scarcely the width of an ordinary
roadway on its top, more than two hundred feet to its highest
point, near its southern extremity, when it declines abruptly to
the river and terrace formation at its base. The highest point
affords but a few square rods of level ground, which are entirely
covered by the stone mound which is composed entirely of rough
stone which have been gathered on the adjacent hillsides, which
is proved by the fact that no loose stone small enough to be
carried by hand are found near the mound. No stones larger than
a strong man can carry are found in the composition of the mound,
which is entirely of stone to its very base. The dimensions of
the structure are about thirty by forty feet, and about four feet
in height, the sides dropping over the sides of the hill, which
are very steep at this point. A few years since an ash tree was
growing on the top, near the center, having taken root in the
soil which had gathered in the spaces between the stones, but it
did not thrive and has decayed and disappeared. This mound has
always been a place of interest to the people of the
neighborhood, and many rude, unsystematic investigations have
been made, but have developed very little regarding the object of
the original structure. People who visited the place more than
sixty years ago say that it was a walled inclosure of oval form,
but little more than a rod in extent, consisting of a rude, dry
wall a few feet high, and empty within except a confused mass of
human bones heaped promiscuously at the bottom of the inclosed
space. The searcher who delves for its secrets will now find
numerous fragments of human bones, a few sherds of rude pottery,
such as are now found on the most recent formations of the river
valley. But what is more interesting is the fact that numerous
bones of small mammals, birds, and the land turtle, also shells
of the river mussel, of the same species now found in the river.
Among the bones of mammals I have identified those of the fox,
groundhog, and muskrat. The observations of the writer and what
has been learned from others leads to the thought that this class
of structures are among the most recent in origin of all
aboriginal remains in this part of the country. In the Southern
States the erection of stone mounds are directly traceable to the
modern Indians, even down to the advent of Europeans, while in
the North among the Hurons, and many kindred
Observations on Faunal Changes. 5
tribes, what was called the feast of the dead was celebrated
every few years, when all the dead of each division or clan were
collected and deposited in a common sepulcher, making such an
accumulation of bones as would account for the quantity
originally found at the Brown's Hill mound. In a case mentioned
by the Jesuit missionary, Brebeuf, a pit was used instead of a
walled inclosure, but the transition would not be great so long
as the object seems to have been the collection and preservation
of the remains of the dead. All through the valley rude
implements and pottery are found which indicate that the country
bordering the river was recently inhabited by barbarous men. The
local collector knows of many sites where villages have been
which contained a large population long since the builders of the
mounds departed. By the washing away of the river banks, rude
camp hearths are disclosed, showing traces which can be but two
or three centuries old. All this and many more things leads the
inquirer into this subject to ask what became of the dead.
Occasionally a rude grave is discovered, often dug into a mound
from the top, and a few cemeteries have been discovered where
less than a score of graves are disclosed. The investigation of
the history of the stone mounds has perhaps partially answered
the question.
Contents of Bulletin No.1
Brookville Society page
IUB Geology Library
Homepage