 |
Reading Photographs: Photographic Analysis
While Dixon's initial original purpose in this monumental endeavor was to evoke a romantic image of Indians as a "Vanishing Race," his photographs can be used as documents of American Indian culture and history of the early 1900s.
A photograph is a selective recording of a visual scene. The camera does not see all, and what it sees can be intentionally manipulated both by the photographer and by the subject. Understanding the degree of photographic manipulation is necessary for th
e evaluation of any particular image or set of images.
One of the most common ways photographers manipulated
Indian images was through the use of studio props. In much the same way
that "old-time" photographers today have a stock of clothing in
which to "dress up," photographers might have a stock of "Indian"
objects--clothing, war bonnets, tomahawks, etc.--with which they
posed their subjects. Thus, one of the first steps in evaluating
a set of photographs is to look for objects which appear in more
than one photograph.
left, Jim Battiste [W3431], right Mant
Mundi
[W3429]
There is very little evidence of such manipulation in
Dixon's photographs. One of the few examples is a pair of
photographs from the 1913 expedition showing two men from the
Siletz Reservation in Oregon
wearing the same leather shirt, pants and necklaces. It is not
clear who -- Dixon or the men themselves -- decided to have them
wear the same clothes.
A more common manipulation is the use of darkroom techniques
to manipulate the atmosphere--the background, sky, or clouds--of
a photograph. There are several cases which show such
photographic manipulation to enhance the romantic image. The most
obvious is "The Sunset of a Dying Race."
This image began in 1909, when Dixon had the participants in
his "Last Council" ride over a hilltop while he photographed
them.
[W2671]
From one of the negatives of this series, he then prepared
an "overlay" of celluloid to block out two of the figures. For
the final print, the sky was artificially darkened to simulate a
sunset.
[W1485a]
Still another form of image manipulation is metonymy, the
use of a part to stand for the whole. In photography, this is the
presentation of only one image of a scene or portrait to stand
for the whole person. For instance, Dixon's image of Indians
presented through the published photographs was one in which most
evidence of Euro-American artifacts was removed, and the subjects
are wearing their best "Indian clothes." This can leave the
impression that Indians still wore "traditional" clothes into the 20th
century. However, the collections also includes snapshots showing more
informal and daily dress.
Mountain Chief (Blackfoot)[W1759]
In this second photograph, Mountain Chief (on the right) wears a three piece
western-cut suit, a watch fob, and a broad brimmed hat. Indeed,
all of the Indians in this photograph wear Euro-American clothes;
their only visible clue to their Indian identity is their braids
and one feather; there is no reason to suspect that these are not
their normal "good clothes." Ironically, it is Dixon who dressed
up in a "costume"--crowned campaign hat, riding britches, leather
leggings, and high top boots.
[W2126]
Next Section
|