![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||||||||
|
Research
Results: Evaluating Nonprofit Databases Kirsten A. Grønbjerg. American Behavioral Scientist 45 (June-July, No. 11): 1741-77. Copyright © 2002 by Sage Publications, Inc. Abstract reprinted by permission of Sage Publications, Inc. Revised version of paper presented under slightly different titles at the Annual Meetings of ARNOVA, Miami, FL., November 29-December 1 and at Conference on Data Resources and Research Opportunities, Social Science Research Council. Washington, D.C. October 4. Abstract The nonprofit
sector's increasing size, mounting political relevance, and growing visibility
to social scientists, have put a premium on securing good data on the
sector's scope, characteristics, and trends. A variety of national and
state-wide data initiatives have responded to these developments. Most
of the resulting databases, however, are problematic, especially at the
level of local communities, and our knowledge about the sector is therefore
likely to be incomplete and/or biased. This paper reports on an effort
to create and assess a comprehensive nonprofit database, using Indiana
as a test case. Three institutional databases (IRS-registration, state
incorporation, and phone listings) were combined and supplemented from
local listings in eleven communities across the state. An alternative
sampling strategy, a hyper-network approach, was also included for comparison.
The results show major gaps in both the IRS and state incorporation databases
and a surprisingly small overlap between the two. The databases, and various
definitions of the sector, differ in their portrait of the sector and
these differences in profiles are not consistent from one community to
the next. Home | Citing and Terms of Use | Restricted Access
|
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||