![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||||||||
|
Research
Results: Examinging
the Landscape of Indiana's Nonprofit Sector: Kirsten A. Grønbjerg and Richard M. Clerkin Nonprofit
and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 34 (June, No. 2): 232-59. Copyright
© 2005 by Sage Publications, Inc. Abstract reprinted by permission
of Sage Publications, Inc. Revised version of paper
presented under slightly different titles at Annual Conference of the
Academy of Management, New Orleans, LA., August 8-11, 2004 and the Annual
Meetings of ARNOVA, November 18-20, 2003, Denver, Colorado. Abstract We examine technical aspects of surveying nonprofits to determine whether inferences about characteristics of the sector depend on how samples are selected. Using a stratified sample drawn from a comprehensive nonprofit database, we analyze how major profile features of the nonprofit sector vary by sampling source and by how broadly researchers define the sector. We find significant differences in the accuracy, completeness, and response rates associated with alternative sampling sources and that nonprofits found on multiple listings respond at higher rates and are more formalized than those found on only one sampling source. We also find that sampling sources vary in the profiles they generate for the nonprofit sector. We conclude that researchers who wish to generalize their findings to the full nonprofit sector should consider the list of incorporated nonprofits as a sampling frame - it is among the most efficient and produces the fewest distortions in nonprofit profile features. Home | Citing and Terms of Use | Restricted Access
|
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||