EDO-CS-90-09 Sept 1990

Debate and Communication Skills

Prepared by: Nola Kortner Aiex

ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading, English, and Communication Digest #56


Most parents are happy when their elementary school age children manifest an interest in little league baseball, after-school soccer, or beginning track-and-field. Parents feel that athletics can teach their youngsters how to compete with others and also how to function as part of a team. There is, however, another activity which can help young children learn to be part of a team but which places less emphasis on competition and which is, in addition, less gender specific than athletics. That activity is debate.

According to one educator (Lybbert, 1985), the debate discipline has three goals: (1) the enhancement of critical thinking and reasoning abilities; (2) academic advancement or development; and (3) the promotion of communication skills. For young children, the focus can be on the development of oral communication skills. And beginning a debate program with young children in elementary school can go a long way toward removing the somewhat elitist aura that surrounds debate in high school and college.


KIDSPEAK

Littlefield and Littlefield (1989) describe an innovative after-school program for grades three through six which was specifically designed to teach oral communication skills to children. The program is called KIDSPEAK and was initiated in 1987. Debate represents only one of the units contained in the program, along with such topics as oral reading, listening, creative expression, storytelling, communication etiquette, etc. Teachers who were interested in the debate activity were given a short training session and access to additional help if they felt they needed it.

Debate concepts are presented to the children in simplified form in lessons lasting 15 or 20 minutes. Each lesson emphasizes a certain skill and contains a writing exercise. For example:

"Lesson #6: Good Behavior for the Answerer. When you are answering questions, there are certain rules you should follow:

"Working in pairs, practice giving answers in a courteous way. Remember the rules and try to answer each question in as complete a way as possible."

"Now--write down some questions here that you can use in practice."

Debate topics were chosen by the children but were subject to teacher approval. The topics ranged from the personal (often chosen by the younger children) to the political and environmental--the Panama Canal Treaty and smokers' rights, for example. Carre (1987) describes a similar classroom project in which seven-year-olds debated the controversial environmental issue of the building of a new road to their town.

The KIDSPEAK project culminated in a debate presented for the children's parents who were pleased with the results and with their children's mastery of debate concepts at such a young age.


MIDDLE SCHOOLS

The Florida Department of Education introduces debate into the curriculum as early as middle school or junior high school (Curriculum Frameworks grades 6-8, 1986). A program such as KIDSPEAK would be an excellent introduction for the more structured course in speech and debate for middle schools. The Florida program outlines its major concepts/content as follows: "The purpose of this course is to introduce the fundamentals of formal and informal communication. The content should include, but not be limited to, forms of oral communication, techniques of group discussion, fundamentals of parliamentary procedure, elements of debate and debate activities, basic techniques of public speaking, and techniques of evaluation." Among the 11 aims for successfully completing the course are (1) use the minimum essentials of parliamentary procedure; (2) utilize fundamental concepts of debating in debate activities; and (3) identify careers related to successful debating skills.

Since the experts generally agree that communication apprehension increases as the child passes through adolescence, perhaps the earlier introduction of speech/debate courses in the curriculum would allow the student to acquire communication skills more easily.


A CROSS-GENERATIONAL PROGRAM

A cross-generational debate program that emphasizes communication skills was developed as a 4-H project in Pennsylvania. Atwater (1984) describes a successful project that included two classes of elementary school children from two different schools who debated the proposal "Resolved, that nuclear power should become our country's primary source for developing electricity in the future." Judges were senior students from the 4-H program, and an adult leader served as an overall moderator. The project generated a sheet entitled "Helpful Tips for the Debater," and successive topics were selected from discussions at 4-H meetings.

The tips sheet includes tips for before the debate (such as, "when introduced, smile and look at the audience"); during the debate ("try to use words that create clear pictures"); and after the debate ("try to evaluate your own presentation"). Additionally, 10 tips on delivery were enumerated--tips which could serve for anyone intent on improving his or her communication skills:


EXPERT OPINIONS

Sodikaw (1985) believes that debate helps students develop the emotional maturity to win and lose graciously; acquire the social skills necessary to work with a colleague and compete against other students; and use spoken English in an increasingly sophisticated way. Huston (1985) stresses that the student should be encouraged to become adaptable to many different styles of communication. McClain (1989) argues that debate should be seen as a cooperative rather than a competitive endeavor.

Some educators feel that debate should become more audience centered and focused on community issues rather than on tournaments (Stepp, 1989). Many college students who are involved in debate feel that the emphasis on tournament debating makes them too argumentative in everyday life. For younger children, a focus on developing communication skills rather than on competition in debate fosters attitudes of open-mindedness, fairness, and tolerance for the viewpoints of others. (Atwater, 1984)


REFERENCES

Atwater, Deborah. "The 4-H Debate Project: Getting Adults and Children Involved in Communication." 1984, 9p. ED 248 562

Carre, Clive. "Learning through Talking: A Contribution towards the Moral Environment of Seven-Year-Olds Provided by an Environmental Project." Educational Review, 39 (1), 47-53. EJ 351 843

Curriculum Frameworks Grades 6-8: 1986-1987. Tallahassee: Florida State Department of Education, 1986, 38p. ED 295 183

Huston, David. "What Should Be the Goals of High School Debate?: An Examination and Prioritization." Paper presented at the National Forensic League Conference on the State of Debate, Kansas City, MO, 1985, 19p. ED 272 942

Littlefield, Robert S. and Kathy M. Littlefield. "Debate Instruction at the Elementary School Level: An Opportunity to Build Legitimacy." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Francisco, CA, 1989, 17p. ED 314 780

Lybbert, Blair. "What Should be the Goals of High School Debate?" Paper presented at the National Forensic League Conference on the State of Debate, Kansas City, MO, 1985, 9p. ED 272 941

McClain, Thomas B. "Secondary School Debate." Argumentation and Advocacy, 25 (4), 203-04. EJ 392 900

Sodikaw, Richard B. "Pogo the Possum Lives, or We Have Met the Enemy, and They Still Are Us: A Response to Frana and Wallmark." Paper presented at the National Forensic League Conference on the State of Debate, Kansas City, MO, 1985, 20p. ED 272 940

Stepp, Pamela. "Taking CEDA Debaters Out of the Normal Tournament Setting." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Francisco, CA, 1989, 14p. ED 314 771


Digest#56 is EDO-CS-90-09 and was published in September 1990 by the ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading, English, and Communication, 2805 E 10th Street, Bloomington, IN 47408-2698, Telephone (812) 855-5847 or (800) 759-4723. ERIC Digests are in the public domain and may be freely reproduced. Additional copies may be ordered by contacting the ERIC Document Reproduction Service at (800) 443-3742.

This project has been funded at least in part with Federal funds from the U.S. Department of Education under contract number RI88062001. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of Education nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
| NEWS ABOUT READING | ONLINE EDUCATION | WEB RESOURCES | BOOKS & BULLETINS | DIGESTS & BIBLIOS | FAMILY INFO CENTER | LESSON PLANS | Q & A ARCHIVE | DATABASE SEARCH | CHARACTER ED CENTER |
The Clearinghouse on Reading, English, and Communication is an information repository of the Indiana University School of Education.

Dr. Carl B. Smith, Professor