|
|
Stigma
In Global Context: Mental Health Study Indiana University . Bloomington . Indiana |
|
|
Great Britain Sample Design British
Social Attitudes survey sample design and timeline Three
versions of the British Social
Attitudes questionnaire are usually fielded. Each ‘module’ of
questions is asked either of the full sample (around 3,450 respondents)
or of a random two-thirds or one-third of the sample. The Mental Health
Stigma module will be asked of one-third of the sample (around 1,150
people). Sample
design The
British Social Attitudes
survey is designed to yield a representative sample of adults aged 18 or
over. Since 1993, the sampling frame for the survey has been the
Postcode Address File (PAF), a list of addresses (or postal delivery
points) compiled by the Post Office. For
practical reasons, the sample is confined to those living in private
households. People living in institutions (though not in private
households at such institutions) are excluded, as are households whose
addresses were not on the PAF. The
sampling method involved a multi-stage design, with three separate
stages of selection. Selection of sectors At
the first stage, postcode sectors are selected systematically from a
list of all postal sectors in ·
37
sub-regions ·
population
density with variable banding used, in order to create three equal-sized
strata per sub-region ·
ranking
by percentage of homes that were owner-occupied in The
Multiple-Output Indicator (MOI) available through PAF is used when
selecting addresses in Selection
of individuals Interviewers
call at each address selected from PAF and list all those eligible for
inclusion in the sample –
that is, all persons currently aged 18 or over and resident at the
selected address. The interviewer the selects one respondent using a
computer-generated random selection procedure. Where there are two or
more households or ‘dwelling units’ at a selected address,
interviewers first have to select one household or dwelling unit using
the same random procedure. They then follow the same procedure to select
a person for interview. Weighting
Data
are weighted to take account of the fact that not all the units covered
in the survey have the same probability of selection. The weighting
reflects the relative selection probabilities of the individual at the
three main stages of selection: address, household and individual. First,
because addresses in Scotland are selected using the MOI, weights have
to be applied to compensate for the greater probability of an address
with an MOI of more than one being selected, compared to an address with
an MOI of one. (This stage is omitted for the English and Welsh data.) Secondly,
data are weighted to compensate for the fact that dwelling units at an
address which contain a large number of dwelling units are less likely
to be selected for inclusion in the survey than ones which do not share
an address. (We use this procedure because in most cases of MOIs greater
than one, the two stages will cancel each other out, resulting in more
efficient weights.) Thirdly,
data are weighted to compensate for the lower selection probabilities of
adults living in large households compared with those living in small
households. By way of illustration, in 2002 the weights were capped at
8.0 (causing three cases to have their weights reduced). The mean weight
was 1.82. The weights are scaled down to make the number of weighted
productive cases exactly equal to the number of unweighted productive
cases. 2005 survey timeline Dec – Mar: questionnaire development and 2 small
scale paper pilots of new questions April - May: questionnaire programming and document
preparation June: personal briefings of interviewers June - September: main fieldwork September - November: Cleaning and editing of
dataset December: clean data available
|
|
|
1022 E. Third Street, Bloomington, IN 47405 (812) 855-3841 Last updated: 6 September 2005 |
||