Banner: Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Program at Indiana University Bloomington

 

‘Hands-on’ Seminar Summary: Facilitating Collaboration On Research Topics Of Mutual Interest

The topics of interest expressed by participants in the seminar are listed below. If you see among them topics close to your own interest and would like to collaborate with colleagues, please reply with the numbers of topics that interest you and we’ll put you in touch with colleagues who share your interests.

  1. How do I know that my students are learning in my class? How shall I study the learning process? What data is sufficient? How is it collected? How do I find out if course objectives have been met? Does my teaching lead to the learning objectives I expect?
  2. Effectiveness of active learning methods
  3. Relationship of teaching method and assessments to student learning
  4. Skills developed by students as a consequence of different instructional methods.
  5. How do students form a perception of themselves as quantitatively capable (or not) and what are the consequences for the teaching/learning process? What are the most effective pedagogical techniques for teaching warranted reasoning skills? For teaching and learning science?
  6. Are good computer assisted learning techniques better for producing abstract reasoning & learning than good traditional learning approaches.
  7. Assessing use of technology and group work.
  8. What is the value of the internet in teaching/learning? Are tutorials needed in addition to lectures? Do students in 250 Logic who tutor students in 150 Logic perform better on final exams than students who do not tutor? Do students in 150 who are tutored by students in 250 perform better on the final exam than un-tutored students.
  9. Effective pedagogy for fostering critical thinking.
  10. Mindful teaching
  11. Will the initiation and growth of the Latino Studies Program have a direct impact on the recruitment, retention, and graduation of Latino Students at IU?
  12. Maximizing the success of minority students. I wish to quantify how many minority students are needed in a discussion section of a large class to maximize GPA of all the students in the discussion section and to decrease the alienation felt by the minority students. I think that the critical mass of minority studentsneeded is about 30% (or ten same race minority students in a class of 30). I believe that by decreasing alienation the minority students will have better grades than students that are alone in a class full of white students resulting in improved retention and persistence. Additionally, I also feel that the white students will benefit from the diversity in the classroom and will also have better grades than white students with no diversity in their classroom.
  13. Student beliefs and changing them.
  14. Curriculum development that focuses on student empowerment issues. Researching student and faculty perceptions of their own empowerment.
  15. What is the effect on student learning of student evaluation of class activities administered at various times in the course? Are end-of-semester student evaluations of the instructor “valid”? Is it possible to evaluate what student evaluations actually tell the teacher?
  16. Do students’ “claimed” class plans (measured as time allocation) match what they actually do when in their own class? Organizational development in libraries and higher education in support of teaching and learning

 

back to SOTL top page

SITE LINKS: What is SOTL | Funding | Community | Events | Bibliography | Resources | Contact Us

Last updated: 6 November 2000

URL: http://www.indiana.edu/~sotl/
Comments to: teaching@indiana.edu
Copyright 2000, the Trustees of Indiana University