Banner: Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Program at Indiana University Bloomington

 

IU SOTL Bibliography

Absolute Essentials

Part A. Fundamentals of Good Teaching

Part B. Student Heterogeneity

Part C. Curricular Reform

Part D. Online Resources

NOTE: Please send suggestions to smiths@indiana.edu. Professor Craig Nelson graciously provided the initial titles of books and articles in this bibliography.

Absolute Essentials

Two Major Collections of Key Articles:

B. A. Pescosolido and R. Aminzade, eds. 1999. The Social Worlds of Higher Education: Handbook for Teaching in a New Century. Pine Forge Press [55+ articles]. With a companion CD: J. H. Shin et al. 1999. Field Guide for Teaching in a New Century: Ideas from Fellow Travelers. [Includes 70+ additional items with particular emphasis on pedagogical techniques.]

K. A. Feldman and M. B. Paulsen, eds. 1998. Teaching and Learning in the College Classroom. 2nd ed. ASHE Reader. Ginn Press/Simon and Schuster] [50+ articles] [ASHE = Association for the Study of Higher Education]

Two Books that Will Probably Change Your Pedagogy:

T. A. Angelo and K. P. Cross. 1993. Classroom Assessment Techniques. 2nd ed. Jossey-Bass.

B. E. F. Walvoord and V. J. Anderson. 1998. Effective grading: A tool for learning and assessment. Jossey-Bass.

Two Major Reports

The Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. 1998. Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America's Research Universities. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. See Website.

NSF Division of Undergraduate Education. 1996. Shaping The Future: New Expectations for Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology. See Website.

One of the Examples Showing That Different Pedagogy Really Matters:

R. R. Hake. 1998. Interactive-engagement vs. traditional methods: A six- thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics 66, 64.

M. D. Sorcinelli. 1991. Research findings on the Seven Principles. Ch. 2 in A. W. Chickering and Z. F. Gamson. Applying the Seven Principles in Undergraduate Education. Jossey-Bass.

Back to top

Part A: Fundamentals of Good Teaching

A1. Recent, Good Handbooks (Manna for beginners, sauce for experts)

W. McKeachie [and others] 1998. Teaching Tips. A Guidebook for the Beginning College Teacher. 10th ed. Houghton Mifflin.

R. Boice. 1996. First-Order Principles for College Teachers: Ten Basic Ways to Improve the Teaching Process. Anker.

S. D. Brookfield. 1995. Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher. Jossey-Bass.

W. E. Campbell and Karl A. Smith, eds. 1997. New Paradigms For College Teaching. Interaction Book Company (612-831-9500). [Includes Craig E. Nelson. Tools For Tampering With Teaching's Taboos.]

B. G. Davis. 1993. Tools for Teaching. Jossey-Bass. Paperback.

B. L. Erickson and D. W. Strommer. 1991. Teaching College Freshmen. Jossey-Bass.

J. Lowman. 1995. Mastering the Techniques of Teaching. 2nd ed. Jossey-Bass.

R. J. Menges, M. Weimer, and associates. 1996. Teaching on Solid Ground: Using Scholarship to Improve Practice. Jossey-Bass.

K. W. Pritchard and R. M. Sawyer, eds. 1994. Handbook of College Teaching: Theory and Applications. Greenwood Press. [Ch. 28—“Dealing with Troublesome Behaviors in the Classroom,” by Mary Deane Sorcinelli—is said to be one of the best on this topic.]

A2. SELECTED Articles (and a book) on Classroom Performance

J. Lowman. 1995. What Constitutes Masterful Teaching? Ch. 1 in his Mastering the Techniques of Teaching. 2nd ed. Jossey-Bass.

P. J. Frederick. 1986. The Lively Lecture—Eight Variations. College Teaching 34:43-50

W. E. Cashin. 1985. Improving Lectures. Idea Paper No. 14. and W. E. Cashin and P. McKnight. 1986. Improving Discussions. Idea Paper No. 15.

M. Gregory. If Education is a Feast, Why Do We Restrict the Menu? A Critique of Pedagogical Metaphors. College Teaching 34:2.

P. Frederick: The Dreaded Discussion: Ten Ways To Start. Improving College and University Teaching 29:109-14.

R. T. Tauber and C. S. Mester. 1994. Acting Lessons for Teachers: Using Performance Skills in the Classroom. Praeger.

A3. Paths to a Great Syllabus

J. Grunet. 1997. The Course Syllabus: A Learning-Centered Approach. Anker.

Office of Teaching Effectiveness, University Colorado-Denver. 1999 [and online]. Nutshell Notes 7(1) Launching a Teaching System-1: A Higher-Level. Syllabus and the antecedent materials on Website.

Also see the chapters in the handbooks (A1 above) by B. G. Davis, W. McKeachie, and Campbell and Smith.

A4. Writing

J. M. Williams and L. McEnerney. Online. Writing in College: A Short Guide to College Writing. Written for students.

A5. Active Learning, Discussions, and Learning Communities

K. Bosworthand S. Hamilton, eds. 1994. Collaborative Learning and College Teaching. Jossey-Bass. [Includes Craig E. Nelson Collaborative Learning and Critical Thinking.]

D. Bligh, ed. 1986. Teaching Thinking by Discussion. Taylor and Francis.

F. Gabelnick, J. McGregor, R. S. Matthews, and B. L. Smith. 1990. Learning Communities: Creating Connections Among Students, Faculty and Disciplines. Jossey-Bass.

A. Goodsell, M. Maher, and V. Tinto. 1992. Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education. National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning and Assessment.

D. W. Johnson, R. T. Johnson and K. A. Smith. 1991. Cooperative Learning: Increasing College Faculty Instructional Productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report.

C. Meyers and T. B. Jones. 1993. Promoting Active Learning. Jossey-Bass.

B. J. Millis and P. G. Cottell Jr. 1998. Cooperative Learning For Higher Education Faculty. Oryx.

N. A. Whitman. 1988. Peer Teaching. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report.

A6. Critical Thinking

J. Kurfiss 1989. Critical Thinking. ASHE/ERIC Higher Education Report. (Superb Brief Survey. Buy it and other ASHE/ERIC reports @ 202/296- 2597).

A7. Discourse Communities

K. A. Bruffee. 1999. Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge. 2nd ed. Johns Hopkins.

A8. Classroom Assessment, Exams and Grades

T. A. Angelo and K. P. Cross. 1993. Classroom Assessment Techniques. 2nd ed. Jossey-Bass, 427 pp. Paperback. [Listed above as essential].

B. E. F. Walvoord and V. J. Anderson. 1998. Effective grading: A tool for learning and assessment. Jossey-Bass. [Listed above as essential].

Clegg and Cashin. 1986. Improving MULTIPLE Choice Tests. Idea Paper No. 16;; W. Cashin. 1987. Improving Essay Tests. Idea Paper No. 17; and Hanna and Cashin. 1988. Improving College Grading. Idea Paper 19.

L. C. Jacobs and C. I. Chase. 1992. Developing and Using Tests Effectively: A Guide for Faculty. Jossey-Bass.

L. L. Baird. 1985. Do Grades and Tests Predict Adult Accomplishment? Research in Higher Education, 23:3-85. [Very weakly; Achievement in same area much better.].

O. Milton, H. R. Pollio, and J. A.. Eison. 1986. Making Sense of College Grades: Why the Grading System Does Not Work and What Can Be Done About It. Jossey-Bass.

A9. Assessment & Evaluation of Teaching

L. Richlin and B. Manning. 1995. Improving a College/University Teaching Evaluation System. Alliance Publishers. [Teach-Yourself Teach- Each-Other Courses on Basic Teaching, Building Teaching Portfolios and Peer Review. A Must See.]

P. Seldin. 1997. The Teaching Portfolio: A Practical Guide to Improved Performance and Promotion/tenure Decisions. 2nd ed. Anker.

N. Van Note Chism. 1999. Peer Review of Teaching: A Sourcebook. Anker.

T. W. Banta and Associates. 1993. Making a Difference: Outcomes of a Decade of Assessment in Higher Education. Jossey-Bass.

W. E. Cashin. 1988. Student Ratings of Teaching: A Summary of the Research. Idea Paper 20.

H. W. Marsh. 1984. Students' Evaluations of University Teaching: Dimensionality, Reliability, Validity, Potential Biases, and Utility. Journal of Educational Psychology 76: 707-754. [One of the best-supported personnel evaluation systems in any profession.]

K. A. Feldman. 1987. Research Productivity and Scholarly Accomplishment of College Teachers as Related to Their Instructional Effectiveness: A Review and Exploration. Research in Higher Education 16: 227-98. [Research productivity and instructional effectiveness “essentially” independent.]

Back to top

Part B: Student Heterogeneity (Diversity)

B1. Cognitive Development

R. G. Fuller, ed. 1987. Piagetian Programs in Higher Education. ADAPT Program, University of Nebraska.

J. D. Herron. 1975. Piaget for Chemists: Explaining What “Good” Students Cannot Understand. Journal of Chemical Education 52:146-50.

W. G. Perry, Jr. [1970] 1998. Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years, A Scheme. New introduction by Lee Knefelkamp. Jossey-Bass.

R. J. Kloss. 1994. A nudge is best: Helping students through the Perry scheme of intellectual development. College Teaching 42:151-58.

C. Nelson. 1999. On The Persistence Of Unicorns: The Tradeoff Between Content And Critical Thinking Revisited. In B. A. Pescosolido and R.Aminzade, eds. The Social Worlds of Higher Education. Pine Forge Press. [Apply Perry in the classroom.]

M. Basseches. 1984. Dialectical Thinking and Adult Development. Ablex Publishing.

M. B. Baxter Margolda. 1992. Knowing and Reasoning in College, Gender-Related Patterns in Students' Intellectual Development. Jossey-Bass, 446 pp.

M. B. Baxter Margolda. 1999. Creating Contexts for Learning and Self-Authorship: Constructive-Developmental Pedagogy. Vanderbilt.

M. Belenky, B. Clinchy, N. Goldberger, and J. Tarule. [1986] 1997. Women's Ways of Knowing. 10th Anniversary ed. Basic Books.

R. Kegan. 1994. In Over Our Heads: The Mental Demands of Modern Life. Harvard.

P. M. King and K. Strohm Kitchner. 1994. Developing Reflexive Judgement: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults. Jossey-Bass. [Liberal Education 78(1), Jan./Feb. 1992, is devoted to reflexive judgment as applied in different disciplines]

B2. Learning Styles

C. S. Claxton and P. H. Murrell. 1987. Learning Styles: Their Impact on Teaching and Administration. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Research Report. [Great.]

C. C. Bonwell. Online. N. Fleming's VARK [Visual, Aural, Read/write, and Kinesthetic sensory modalities] Inventory. Instrument and support on Website.

A. F. Grasha. 1995. Teaching With Style: A Practical Guide To Enhancing Learning By Understanding Teaching And Learning Styles. Alliance.

D. A. Kolb. 1984. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall.

M. D. Svinicki and N. M. Dixon. 1987. The Kolb Model Modified for Classroom Activities. College Teaching 35:141-46.

J. A. Provost and S. Anchors, eds. 1987. Applications, of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in Higher Education. Consulting Psychologists Press. [Try the following book by Lawrence first, if new to MBTI.]

G. Lawrence. 1982. People Types and Tiger Stripes, A Practical Guide to Learning Styles. 2nd ed. Center For Applications of Psychological Type. [Best overview of Myers-Briggs for teaching, but not focused on higher education.]

D. Keirsey. Online. Keirsey Temperament Theory [somewhat parallel to MBTI]. Keirsey Temperament Sorter etc. free from Website.

B3. Experiential Heterogeneity

Two Major Collections of Key Articles:

J. S. Glazer, E. M. Bensimon and B. K. Townsend, eds. 1993. Women in Higher Education: A Feminist Perspective. ASHE Reader. Ginn Press/Simon and Schuster

C. Turner, M. Garcia, A. Nora and L. I. Rendon. 1996. Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Higher Education. ASHE Reader. Ginn Press/Simon and Schuster.

Three Gripping General Examples [in 4 sources]:

C. M. Steele. 1997. A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist 52:613-29.

M. Rose. 1989. Lives On The Boundary: A Moving Account of the Struggles and Achievements of America's Underclass. Penguin Books. [Chs. 7 and 8 essential.]

[P.] U. Treisman. 1992. Studying Students Studying Calculus: A Look at the Lives of Minority Mathematics Students in College. College Mathematics Journal 23: 362-72. [UC Berkely, Workshop Calculus, African-American D/F/W rate from 60 percent to 4 percent.] See also R. E. Fullilove and P. U. Treisman. 1990. Mathematics Achievement Among African American Undergraduates at the University of California, Berkeley: An Evaluation of the Mathematics Workshop Program. Journal of Negro Education 59: 463-78.

D. W. Miller 1998. Opportunity Without Preference: Colleges that Set the Standard for Boosting Black Achievement. Policy Review [Heritage Foundation] Nov./Dec. 1998. Website summarizes more data. See also ongoing projects at U Illinois, and Northeastern U's Project Excel.

Additional Resources

M. Adams, ed. 1992. Promoting Diversity in College Classrooms: Innovative Responses for the Curriculum, Faculty and Institutions. Jossey-Bass.

M. J. Bennett. 1986. Towards Ethnorelativism: A Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity. In Michael Paige, ed. Cross-Cultural Orientation, pp. 27-69. University Press of America. [Multicultural development parallels Perry.]

L. L. B. Border and N. Van Note Chism, eds. 1992. Teaching for Diversity. Jossey-Bass.

T. Kochman. 1981. Black and White Styles in Conflict. University of Chicago.

C. E. Nelson. 1996. Student Diversity Requires Different Approaches to College Teaching, Even in Math and Science. American Behavioral Scientist 40:165-75. [Entire issue on “Multiculturalism and diversity in higher education.”]

S. V. Rosser. 1986. Teaching Science and Health From A Feminist Perspective: A Practical Guide. Pergamon.

S. V. Rosser. 1997. Re-Engineering Female Friendly Science. Teachers College Press.

S. Tobias. 1990. They're Not Dumb, They're Different. Stalking the Second Tier. Research Corporation.

K. Weiler. 1988. Women Teaching For Change: Gender, Class and Power. Bergan and Harvey. [Concise overview, 163 pp.]

Back to top

Part C: Curricular Reform: Issues & Resources

Issue 1—Coverage:

M. D. Sundberg and M. L. Dini. 1993. Science majors vs. nonmajors: Is there a difference? Journal of College Science Teaching Mar./Apr. 1993:299-304. [Multiple sections and instructors. Both courses taught with traditional pedagogy, but with different intensities of ‘coverage.’ “The most surprising, in fact shocking, result of our study was that the majors completing their course did not perform significantly better than the corresponding cohort of nonmajors.” [Note: Less wasn't more, without pedagogical change, but more wasn't more either—and student attitudes suffered.]

I. J. Russell, W. D. Hendricson, and R. J. Herbert. 1984. Effects of lecture information density on medical student achievement. Journal of Medical Education 59:881-89. [Three different lectures on the same subject. 90 percent of the sentences in the high-density lecture disseminated new information as did 70 percent in the medium and 50 percent in the low. Remaining time used for restating, highlighting significance, more examples, and relating the material to the student's prior experience. Students randomly distributed into the 3 groups (no significant differences in prior GPA or on knowledge base pretest). Students in low treatment learned and retained lecture information better. Here less is more. (From C. C. Bonwell.)

Issue 2—Technology:

T. R. Russell. 1997. Explaining, Exploring [and] Understanding the No Significant Difference Phenomenon. Adult Assessment Forum Winter 1997: 6-9. [“. . . scholars have been able to find no significant difference resulting from the use or lack thereof of technological means of delivery.” “No matter how it is produced, how it is delivered, whether or not it is interactive, low-tech or high tech, students learn equally well . . . even though students would rather be on campus with an instructor if that were a real choice.” At Russell lists approx. 250 studies on the Website. [CEN: If we don't like this conclusion we should either document the differences or, if possible, change classroom pedagogy so that it is better than technology can provide.]

Two Evaluations of Our Collective Success:

A. W. Chickering and L. Reisser. 1993. Education and Identity. 2nd ed. Jossey-Bass. [A good place for experienced faculty to begin to consider the scholarship of teaching.]

E. T. Pascarella and P. T. Terenzini. 1991. How College Affects Students. Jossey-Bass. [Content through moral development. 894 pp. Reviews approx. 3000 references.]

Holistic Solutions (with More Issues) [Also see Pescosolido and Aminzade, above]:

J. G. Gaff, J. L. Ratcliff and Associates. 1996. Handbook of the Undergraduate Curriculum: A Comprehensive Guide to Purposes, Structure, Practices and Change. Jossey-Bass.

L. F. Gardnier. 1994. Redesigning Higher Education: Producing Dramatic Gains in Student Learning. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Research Report.

P. G. Love and A. Goodsell Love. 1995. Enhancing Student Learning: Intellectual, Social and Emotional Integration. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Research Report.

Two Prime Examples of Success:

Alverno College, Milwaukee WI, a small little-selective Catholic women's college. Curriculum an especially innovative and effective experiment in undergraduate education (deeply focused on eight central abilities or outcomes; new departures in the use of assessment as part of learning), extensively documented (some on Website, but ask for the complete list), and highly lauded (e.g., a MacArthur Foundation “genius” grant to the college, 1 of 3 Pew Leadership Awards, and citation by the Carnegie Foundation as one of three institutions where undergraduate education is working [other 2: Harvard, University of Chicago]).

Washington Center for Improving the Quality of Undergraduate Education, at Evergreen State College [A good place to begin looking into learning communities and collaborative learning.]

Back to top

Part D: Online Resources

See list of linked online resources.

 

back to SOTL top page

SITE LINKS: What is SOTL | Funding | Community | Events | Bibliography | Resources | Contact Us

Last updated: 29 April 2003

URL: http://www.indiana.edu/~sotl/
Comments to: teaching@indiana.edu
Copyright 2000, the Trustees of Indiana University