Improving Civic Education in Schools
By John J. Patrick
October 2002
Civic education is the teaching of knowledge, skills, and dispositions
needed to become a responsible and effective citizen of a
representative and constitutional democracy. Since the founding of the
United States of America, civic education has been part of the core
curriculum of elementary and secondary schools. In recent years,
however, leaders in education, government,
and the general public have expressed concerns about the quality and
outcomes
of civic education in American schools (Galston 2001, 218-220). They
have
called emphatically for renewal and reform of civic education in
schools. This Digest discusses
(1) the current deficiencies of civic education in schools, (2)
research-based recommendations for improving content and pedagogy of
civic education, and (3) Internet resources on improving civic
education in schools.
CURRENT DEFICIENCIES
The outcomes of civic education in schools are unsatisfactory. Results
of the 1998 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in
civics
revealed gross deficiencies in the civic knowledge of students. Most
students
in grades 4, 8, and 12 failed to reach the proficient level of
achievement,
which, as specified in the NAEP framework, indicates competence in
civics. Twenty-one percent of fourth grade students, 21% of eighth
grade students,
and 22% of twelfth grade students reached the proficient level. Another
way
to look at the overall findings is to consider the large proportion of
students
that failed to reach the assessment's basic level of achievement: 31%
of
fourth graders, 30% of eighth graders, and 35% of twelfth graders
scored
below the basic level (Lutkus and Others 1999).
The scant, superficial civic knowledge of young Americans is related to
their generally low levels of political participation and civic
engagement, deficiencies in democratic attitudes or dispositions, and
underdeveloped
democratic citizenship skills. Researchers have found strong
relationships
between knowledge of democratic principles, processes, and institutions
and
(1) propensity to vote or otherwise participate in political life, (2)
orientation
to political tolerance and political interest, and (3) competence in
cognitive
and participatory skills of democratic citizenship, such as the
capacities
to analyze public issues and to cooperate with others in a group
project
(Galston 2001, 223-226).
IMPROVING THE CONTENT AND PEDAGOGY OF CIVIC EDUCATION
How can civic educators improve the teaching and learning of civic
knowledge as a key to the development of civic skills and dispositions?
What recommendations can be derived from the research literature?
1. Increase the exposure of students to content in civics by (a)
including it in courses in U.S. history, world history, literature, and
other subjects in the curriculum, (b) emphasizing civics in the social
studies curriculum in the primary grades (K-3), and (c) requiring of
all students a civics course in middle school and a government course
in high school. The justification for a stronger curricular emphasis on
civics is that students' achievement of civic knowledge is related to
the number of courses taken, the breadth and depth of topics studied,
and the amount of time spent on lessons and homework (Niemi and Junn
1998).
2. Systematically teach students to analyze public issues and to
participate democratically in making public policy decisions in
response to the issues. This kind of learning experience in civics and
government courses is likely to develop among students the cognitive
and participatory skills and dispositions necessary for citizenship in
a democracy (Vontz, Metcalf, and Patrick 2000).
3. Create and maintain a classroom climate that is conducive to free
and open exchange of opinions about public issues and other
controversial
topics. This kind of classroom practice is related to the development
of
such civic dispositions as tolerance, civility, propensity to
participate,
and political interest (Baldi and Others 2001; Hahn 1998; Torney-Purta
and
Others 2001).
4. Encourage students to participate in extracurricular activities
involving civic engagement and political participation. There is a
strong, positive relationship between democratic participatory
experiences in school-based organizations and the development of the
skills and dispositions of democratic citizenship (Baldi and Others
2001; Torney-Purta and Others 2001; Verba, Schlozman, and Brady 1995).
5. Foster a democratic ethos in the school. There is a positive
relationship between a democratic school climate and development of
democratic civic disposition and behavior among students; less
authoritarian climates are linked to more democratic political
attitudes and behavior (Baldi and Others 2001; Torney-Purta and Others
2001).
6. Conjoin content and processes in the teaching and learning of civic
knowledge, skills, and dispositions. Civic dispositions and skills,
both intellectual and participatory, are inseparable from a body of
civic knowledge or content. In order to think critically and act
effectively and responsibly in response to a public issue, learners
must understand the terms of the
issue, its origins, the alternative responses to it, and the likely
consequences of these responses. This understanding is based upon the
knowledge of learners. The application of this knowledge to explain,
evaluate, and resolve a public issue depends upon the cognitive process
skills of learners. Both academic content and process -- civic
knowledge, disposition, and skills -- must
be taught and learned in tandem to fulfill the mission of civic
education,
which is to develop individuals who can establish, maintain, and
improve
democratic governance and citizenship in their country and throughout
the
world (Niemi and Junn 1998; Vontz, Metcalf, and Patrick 2000).
INTERNET SOURCES
The following World Wide Web sites include information on civic
education in schools and its implications for the improvement of
instruction and the achievement of students.
American Political Science Association: APSANET. The APSA site includes
papers presenting research on civic education, scholarly essays on
recommendations for the improvement of practice in civic education, and
links to sources of data and papers pertaining to notable research
projects such as the IEA Civic Education Study and the NAEP in civics:
www.apsanet.org/
Center for Civic Education (CCE). The CCE Web site contains papers on
theory, research, and practice in civic education. There also are links
to other useful sites, such as Civnet, which provides information on
international civic education projects:
www.civiced.org/
Center for Information and Research in Civic Learning & Engagement
(CIRCLE). The Center promotes research on the civic engagement of
Americans between the ages of 15 and 25. CIRCLE funds research that has
implications for those who work to increase young people's engagement
in politics and civic life. CIRCLE is also a clearinghouse for relevant
information and scholarship. The Center's Web site includes reports and
papers on research in civic education:
www.civicyouth.org/
National Alliance for Civic Education (NACE). Launched in 2000, NACE
is an alliance of organizations committed to the advancement of civic
knowledge and engagement. The NACE Web site includes reports on
research and practice in civic education with many links to other sites
on civic education:
www.puaf.umd.edu/NACE/
John J. Patrick is Director of the Social Studies Development Center
and Professor of Education, Indiana University, Bloomington.