Civic
Education Trends in
Post-Communist Countries
of Central and Eastern Europe
By Gregory E. Hamot
November 2003
Developments during the decade-and-a-half following the fall of
communism in Central and Eastern Europe
indicate broad advancement in civic education for democracy.
This Digest notes the rising trend in civic education competency
in Central
and Eastern Europe, describes an increasingly accepted and used
framework for civic education, and illustrates this broad advancement
through three significant trends in collaborative projects that
contribute
to civic education in Central and
Eastern Europe.
A TREND TOWARD CIVIC
COMPETENCY
The recent International
Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) study
of
civic knowledge in 28 countries reveals some startling conclusions.
According to national results, the most successful programs for
democratic
citizenship education exist in Poland, the United States, and the
Czech Republic (Torney-Purta et al. 2001). Given this finding,
one
may conclude that collaborative efforts conducted with western
democracies,
particularly the United States, contributed on some level to the
abilities of teachers and students in Poland, the Czech Republic, and
many
other countries where such
collaborations exist, to achieve
the highest levels of civic competence.
TREND TOWARD A COMMON
EDUCATION FOR DEMOCRATIC CITIZENSHIP
John Patrick, through
myriad experiences with projects in Central and Eastern Europe and his
lifelong study
of the teaching and learning of democratic citizenship in the U.S., has
developed a civic education framework
(Patrick 2003). This framework appeals so widely to civic
education reformers that the American
Council for International Education requires that all civic education
programs funded by their international Partners in Education program
include a
balanced assortment of themes from
this framework.
At the heart of Patrick's
framework lie four key components of a common democratic citizenship
education
and an elaboration on democracy's core concepts (2003). First,
the
four key components include civic knowledge, cognitive civic skills,
participatory civic skills, and civic dispositions.
Second, Patrick's global
framework requires that all democratic citizens understand six core
concepts
in order to function most
effectively in their respective
societies. These indispensable concepts include representative
democracy,
constitutionalism (rule of law), rights within the parameters of
liberalism,
citizenship, civil society based on a free and open social system, and
the
market economy of a free and open economic system (Patrick 2003,
26).
THREE TRENDS IN CIVIC
EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS
Many collaborations between
U.S. institutions and educators in Central and Eastern Europe implement
Patrick's framework to produce three distinct trends in civic education
projects. Various combinations of these trends can be found in
each of
the exemplary projects described here. These trends include (1)
original curriculum development for use in pre-adult education, (2)
university
preservice teacher education, and (3) adaptation of existing
curricula.
Trend
1. Original curriculum development for use in pre-adult education.
Projects conducted by
The Ohio State University in collaboration with educators in Poland
and Ukraine have worked to establish
new curricula for civic education that include all of Patrick's four
key components of a common
education for democratic citizenship (Craddock 2003).
Additionally,
The University of Iowa College of Education has collaborated with
educational reformers in the Czech Republic, Bulgaria, and Armenia to
achieve a bottom-up unfolding of new curricula that meet the needs of
local
populations (Hamot 2003; Hlebowitsh
and Hamot 1999). In each of
these projects, the post-communist educators completed residencies at
their host
U.S. institutions to explore curriculum ideas that fit their
national contexts. The core element of this trend in civic
education reform is
the curriculum seminar that meets throughout the residencies.
This
seminar forms the foundation for developing ideas and writing
instructional materials that can be used with pre-adult students in
specific
post-communist environments (Remy 1996).
Among the more popular trends in
democratic teaching methods--methods that enliven Patrick's
framework--emerging
from these projects are Socratic seminars, role playing and
simulations,
historical document analysis, and service learning.
Trend
2: University preservice teacher education. Many partnerships
between U.S. and Central and Eastern
European educators indicate a trend toward developing courses or
complete
certification programs in civic education. A project between
Boston University and Russell Sage College and teacher education
institutions in
Samara, Russia and a project between
Indiana University and Vilnius
Pedagogical University in Lithuania exemplify this trend. Both
projects stem from Civitas: An International Civic Education Exchange
Program,
conducted by the Center for Civic Education.
In the case of Russia, scholars and teacher
educators from the U.S. work with teacher educators in Samara to
develop a preservice teacher education program and textbooks in civic
education. Eventually, this project will lead to the first group
of teachers
certified in civic education. Known as the University Reform
Initiative,
this project required extracurricular civics activities, a notion
shunned
since the staged projects of Soviet times (White 2003) and now a trend
in
teacher education for citizenship.
The Indiana
University initiative with Lithuania follows the trend toward
interdisciplinary preservice
teacher education. This project is developing a curriculum that fuses
social work with civic education. The Vilnius Pedagogical
University's
master's degree program in social education will produce teachers who
not
only act as advocates for child welfare, but also seek to assist
students in analyzing social problems within a developing democracy.
In
so doing, graduates of this program will focus on the intersection of
civic
education and school social work in the areas of Patrick's framework
that include morality, ethics, rights
and responsibilities, empathy, and
positive socialization (Kvieskiene and Mason, in press).
Trend
3: Adaptation of existing curricula. Given the speed with which
Central and Eastern Europe must
democratize, many of the projects emanating from U.S. partnerships
include the adaptation of existing civic education curricula.
Most
prominent among those adaptations is the Center for Civic Education's
Project Citizen
(1996). This curriculum typifies the trend in post-communist
civic
education to re-involve citizens in their political lives and futures
as
members of a democracy. Project
Citizen prescribes a format for
students to investigate a public issue and develop a reasoned policy
that will
address the issue. Suitable to all democracies, Project Citizen is an
example of the trend to adapt existing U.S. materials that meet the
needs of
individual post-communist educational
contexts. Research conducted by Vontz, Metcalf, and Patrick
(2000) on Project Citizen in Latvia and
Lithuania indicates that this approach is successful when indigenous
educational reformers collaborate with U.S. partners in teacher
education
programs and schools throughout post-communist Central and Eastern
Europe.
INTERNET RESOURCES
The
following Web sites contain resources and information on trends in
post-communist civic
education.
*
Civnet <http://www.civnet.org>, the Civitas International Web
site, describes the many programs
conducted by the Center for Civic Education under its Civitas: An
International Civic Education Exchange Program. Additionally,
this site
houses John Patrick's most recent iteration of his global framework for
civic education in a democracy developed in June 2003.
*
The Partners in Education (PiE) Program of the American Councils
for International Education
<http://www.americancouncils.org/program.asp?PageID=83&ProgramID=10> brings together post-communist
educators with U.S. institutions to learn about citizenship education
and to
observe and contribute to academic life at the host institutions.
Participants
are expected to provide a training conference in civics curriculum
development and evaluation upon their
return home.
Gregory E. Hamot is an Associate
Professor of Education at The
University of Iowa.