Graffiti Versus the Law
By Peter Voakes
October 22, 2001
In modern American society, graffiti is often looked
upon as a deviant form of vandalism that destroys the aesthetics of
whatever it is painted upon. These claims fail to realize that graffiti has
become a form of expression for many artists who wish to pursue a new
medium upon which to paint: the urban landscape. In an effort to see beyond
the stereotype of graffiti, I decided to interview a person who has had
experience painting graffiti. During my interview, I asked questions that ranged
from being general to being quite specific, always leading up to the
specific questions instead of asking him flat out. In the end, I gained an
insight into the world of graffiti that I would never have gained without
actually talking to someone involved with graffiti.
The person whom I
interviewed, who has decided to remain anonymous, will be called
Will. Will began experimenting with public art in middle school, drawing on his desk and
on the bathroom walls with a marker. By the time he went to high
school, Will began painting with actual spray paint. Will usually spray paints
around his house, on railroad bridges that extend above the street. Will says
that when he started painting on the bridges by his house, there wasn't
any other graffiti there, but now, the bridges are covered with pieces
that he and his friends have done. Will only paints words, and not
pictures. The words that Will chooses to paint are often influenced by what he is
interested in, as he states: "take a word that sounds good, and make it
look pretty." Will says that he often paints the words "deviate" and "oscillate," and that he
uses the colors black, yellow, red, and purple to paint the words. Typically,
Will says that it can take anywhere from 10 minutes to an hour to finish
a piece.
There are many things that influence Will
when he paints, some of these things he chooses to be influenced by,
and others he does not. One thing that he does not want to be influenced by
is the law. Will says that he does most of his graffiti work at night, simply
because he has the least chance of getting caught at that time of day. Doing
work in the dark often makes it difficult for him because of the
lack of light. Will says that sometimes he works on a piece during
the nighttime, and then when it is light out he returns to the piece to see that
it does not look good at all. To avoid being caught, Will and his
friends also devised a system which included one of them staying and painting,
and the other one being stationed up the road as a sentry. This system
was effective because if a car or a person happened to come, the friend up the
road would make a noise and Will would be able to duck out of sight in time
to not be seen. Will proudly stated that he has been "spotted and chased,
but never caught."
According to Will, and ideal place to paint is on a train
car. There, the artist can take his or her time, and they can also
paint in the daylight. When an artist paints on a stopped train car, he or she can
go back into the woods, away from any crowded area where one might see
them, and paint on the car. One disappointing aspect of painting on a train
car is that the artist will probably never see it again, as Will
lamented over a piece that he did on a train car once, saying: "it was probably one
of the best ones I've ever done, and I never get to see it again."
Will also enjoys watching train cars go by, because on the train car one
can see graffiti from all over the United States, sometimes dating back
to 1987. With all of the risks involved with doing graffiti in public
places, train cars provide a safer alternative.
Being spotted by a police officer can sometimes be a
dangerous affair. Will told the story of a friend of his who was spotted by a police
officer and began to run. As the boy ran, he slipped and fell off of a
bridge, breaking his back. Now, the boy is in a wheelchair for the rest
of his life. One must wonder why graffiti artists feel the need to
run at the first sight of another human being, especially a police
officer. Is graffiti so bad that one must risk his or her life to escape
punishment? In a situation such as this, we must evaluate whether or not graffiti
does as much damage as the police would like us to believe. The only real
damage graffiti does is to the aesthetics of a building, which is all just
a matter of opinion. Mostly, the aesthetics are determined by whoever
owns the building, but when the graffiti is being done to a place that
is not privately owned, and is also not frequented by many people, is there
much need for a strict policy against graffiti?
Will believes that most of the negative
feelings towards graffiti comes from the type of graffiti that is not artistic
at all. This graffiti, which Will says is done by "toys," is usually just some obscene
words done in all one color, usually around a public place that a lot of
people will see. According to Will, this is the type of graffiti that
most people come into contact with most frequently. Another type
of graffiti, which Will is strongly in favor of, is the type that
expresses something, and clearly took the artist some time to paint, as Will states: "the
people who are in [graffiti] for the right reasons won't destroy
things." These graffiti artists will paint in odd places that not everyone
will see. The people who will see the positive graffiti are those
that will appreciate the graffiti and not just dismiss it as petty
vandalism. "The best graffiti is always in the worst places."
Although some people, like Will, are able to make the
distinction between meaningful art and petty vandalism, others are not. "There's a
difference between vandalizing and real spray-painting, and unfortunately, the
police don't see it that way," Will states. The city often paints
over graffiti pieces with no regard to the aesthetic of the piece itself, they
do so only with regard to the aesthetic of that which the piece was
painted upon. Unfortunately, not all graffiti is positive. The graffiti that
is merely empty swear words do not aesthetically benefit anything, but
does this mean that we have to condemn all graffiti as useless and
deleterious? Graffiti is a new art form, one that will not be immediately accepted by
many people at once, but with time, hopefully people can realize that some
graffiti has a positive effect on the community.