|ANTHROPOLOGY JOURNALS: Ethnology
(click these links to travel through the document)
Ethnology is a quarterly journal devoted to “offering the broadest range of general cultural and social anthropology of any anthropological journal in the United States” (Ethnology 2006a). According the journal’s website, Ethnology specifically:
The journal only publishes articles – it does not publish book reviews, editorial comments, or book notes. In short, Ethnology is a place to find or publish short ethnographic articles with a broad range of theoretical and geographic interests.
The current editorial board in charge of fulfilling these goals consists of: Leonard Plotnicov (Editor-in-Chief), Richard Scaglion, Joseph S. Alter, and Marie Norman (Editors), and Katherine A. Lancaster (Managing Editor) (Ethnology 2006b). Plotnicov, Alter, and Scaglion are all professors of anthropology at the University of Pittsburgh, which publishes and finances the journal through the Department of Anthropology and the University Library System (Ethnology 2006a). Marie Norman works at Carnegie Mellon University (also in Pittsburgh), while Katherine Lancaster’s position with the journal is full-time (Katherine Lancaster, e-mail to author, February 28, 2006). As can be seen, the geographical locus of the journal is firmly set in Pittsburgh. However, this geographical locus does not impact the papers published by Ethnology. Only three authors (out of 33 total) published inEthnology in 2004 were alumni of the University of Pittsburgh, and none were present faculty. The authors published in 2004 were housed in universities in several different countries, including the Netherlands, South Africa, and the United Kingdom.
It is also important to note that Ethnology was founded in 1962 by George Murdock (Ethnology2006a), who also helped to establish the Human Relations Area Files. Murdock’s passion for making data-based ethnography available for comparison can be seen in the journal’s goals and composition.
In accordance with its goals, “Ethnology welcomes articles by scientists of any country on any aspect of cultural anthropology; theoretical or methodological discussions, however, will be published only if they specifically relate to some body of substantive data” (Ethnology 2005). Authors who hope to publish in Ethnology can expect to wait approximately six months from the time they submit their manuscripts until the time their papers are published (Leonard Plotnicov, personal communication, March 2, 2006). During the review process, an average of five reviewers, chosen from the editors of the journal and knowledgeable external referees, will review the manuscript (Leonard Plotnicov, personal communication, March 2, 2006). Approximately 35% of the papers submitted to the journal are eventually accepted for publication (Leonard Plotnicov, personal communication, March 2, 2006).
Ethnology has a circulation of approximately 1250, including institutional exchange partners (i.e., institutions who exchange a subscription to their journal for a subscription to Ethnology) (Katherine Lancaster, e-mail to author, February 20, 2006). The journal also reaches a wider audience through licensing agreements with electronic distributors, such as EBSCO (Katherine Lancaster, e-mail to author, February 20, 2006). Compared to some journals, such as the American Anthropologist, which has a circulation of 13,000 (University of California Press 2006), Ethnology does not seem to be especially widespread. However, the journal is somewhat comparable in circulation to other major journals focusing on cultural anthropology, such as Cultural Anthropology (total circulation 2100, including members of the Society for Cultural Anthropology within the American Anthropological Association (AAA)) (University of California Press 2006).
Ethnology’s Intellectual Focus
As mentioned above, Ethnology does not have a single topical focus. After examining the published keywords from the last five years of the journal (the period starting with the Winter 2001 issue and ending with the Spring 2005 issue), I have identified the most common topical keywords in Ethnologyabstracts, which can be seen in Table 1.
Table 1. Most Common Keywords (topical)
1. Gender 10
2. Ethnicity 6
3. Religion 5
3. Globalization 5
5. Migration 4
5. Modernity 4
These top six keywords are taken from a field of 350 keywords from 95 articles. The keyword with the highest frequency, “gender”, was found in 11% of the articles. Most keywords were found far less frequently – only 49 of the 350 keywords were found in more than one abstract. The diversity of keywords reflects the variety of topics covered in the articles published by the journal in the studied period. However, the general zeitgeist of anthropology is reflected in the most common topical keywords – gender, globalization, ethnicity, modernity and migration were all popular topics.
Similarly, Ethnology does not have a geographical focus. Table 2 shows the geographical keywords that appear with the greatest frequency in the abstracts in Ethnology of the last five years.
Table 2. Most Common Keywords (geographical)
1. Japan 10
2. Indonesia 3
2. West Africa 3
4. Ten areas tied 2
As can be seen, Japan is by far the area that received the most coverage, appearing in 11% of the abstracts. No other area appeared in more than 3% of abstracts. It does not appear that there is any editorial bias toward Japan – none of the editors have a Japanese research focus. Nor was there a special issue devoted to Japan, so it appears that this focus on Japan is simply a reflection of the papers received.
Ethnology in Intellectual Space
To examine where Ethnology exists in intellectual space, it is instructive to see which journals were cited most by authors in Ethnology in 2004 (see Table 3).
Table 3. Journals that Ethnology Cited Frequently in 2004
(Thomson Corporation 2006)
Ethnology exists firmly within the mainstream of American cultural anthropology, as is reflected in the appearance of four widely-circulated, mainstream anthropological journals in Table 3. The relative dominance of Japan as a geographical focus explains the number of cites Asahi Shimbun (one of Japan’s largest newspapers) received. These numbers reflect the journal’s place in traditional, mainstream anthropology, but also indicate the willingness of the editorial board to publish the highest-quality papers it receives, even if that means some geographical redundancy.
The following table, which lists the publications which cite Ethnology most frequently in 2004, shows that Ethnology has an impact on other disciplines as well as mainstream anthropology.
Table 4. Journals that Cited Ethnology Frequently in 2004
1. Ethnology 11
2. Cross-Cultural Research 7
3. American Ethnologist 6
Journal of Anthropological Research 6
Sociological Theory 6
(Thomson Corporation 2006)
Ethnology is most frequently cited by two prominent anthropological journals as well as a sociology journal and a multi-disciplinary journal. This is a tribute to the data-based approach Ethnology takes – it is not a journal that only publishes anthropological data and theory for anthropologists, but a journal that makes ethnographic data and theory available to a wide variety of readers.
According to the 2004 Journal Citation Reports (Social Science Edition), published by the Institute for Scientific Information, Ethnology had an “impact factor” of 0.357 in 2004 (Thomson Corporation 2006). To give some reference points, the flagship anthropology journal in the United States, theAmerican Anthropologist, had an impact factor of 0.952 in 2004 (Thomson Corporation 2006), while another major journal, Cultural Anthropology, had an impact factor of 0.941 in 2004 (Thomson Corporation 2006). Ethnology’s lesser impact factor is probably due to the lack of theoretical and methodological articles in the journal. Ethnology’s focus on articles with a “substantive body of data” means that published articles are likely of interest to those with similar geographical and theoretical interests, but not to anthropologists in general. This focus on data-based articles contributes to the cross-disciplinary appeal of the journal and ensures that Ethnology plays a unique and useful role in anthropology today.
2006a Ethnology: An International Journal of Cultural and Social Anthropology. Electronic Document, http://www.pitt.edu/~ethnolog/, accessed February 17, 2006.
2006b Ethnology Editors. Electronic Document, http://www.pitt.edu/~ethnolog/editorial3.html, accessed February 17, 2006
3. Ethnology 2005
Ethnology 44 (1):Front Page.
4. University of California Press
2006 Journals of the American Anthropological Association. Electronic Document, http://www.ucpress.edu/journals/download/UCPress_AAA_Rates.pdf, accessed February 28, 2006
5. The Thomson Corporation
[Footonote 1] The Impact Factor of a journal, is calculated as follows:
Cites in 2004 to articles published in: 2003 = 8 Number of articles published in: 2003 = 21
2002 = 7 2002 = 21
Sum: 15 Sum: 42
Calculation: Cites to recent articles 15 = 0.357
Number of recent articles 42
(Thomson Corporation 2006)
- ProSeminar in Anthropology
- 2013: Exploring the Canon
- Anthropology by other means: Searching for the canon of anthropology in classical studies
- Canon ain’t just numbers, baby!
- Canonicity in Anthropology of Religion
- Capturing the Canon: A Spatial Exploration of Anthropology’s Most Taught Authors
- KPOW! Getting Blasted by Canons in Anthropology
- Locating the Current Canon in Cultural Anthropology: An Examination of Comprehensive Exam Reading Lists from the Perspective of a Prospective Graduate Student
- Manning the Canon: A Textbook Example of Gender Inequality
- Miraculous books, or miraculous prizes? How to divine canonicity and canonization from cultural anthropology’s book awards
- The Construction of a Global Imaginary: translation as a means of measuring canonicity in cultural anthropology
- Turning Points: Core Messages
- 2014 Publication & Anthropology
- Dismantling the Ivory Tower: Risk, and the Viability of Open Access Publication for New Academics
- The Gender Division Exposed: A Case Study of Anthropology Journal Editorial Boards
- The Geopolitics of Anthropology Publishing: A Study of Institutional Locations of Anthropology Scholarship (1975-2013)
- The Reluctant Anthropologist
- “Anxiety Laden” Rituals and Competitive Rites of Passage: Publishing at the Graduate Student Level in Anthropology
- “GIVE IT A TRY”: A Glance at the Medical Anthropologists’ Experiences, Thoughts, and Suggestion about Publishing
- Course Schedule
- Project Summaries
- 2013: Exploring the Canon
- Theory Through Time
- Anthropology Journals
- Associations & Organizations
- American Ethnological Society
- Association of Black Anthropologists
- Associaiton for Feminist Anthropology
- Association of Latina and Latino Anthropologists
- Council on Anthropology and Education
- Cultural Survival
- European Society for Oceanists (ESfO)
- Pan African Association of Anthropology
- Society for Latin American Anthropology
- Society for the Anthropology of Europe
- Society for the Anthropology of Work
- Society for Visual Anthropology
- Disciplines & Subdisciplines
- Anthropology and National Parks
- Anthropology of Performance
- Anthropology of Religion
- Anthropology of the Senses
- Anthropology of Tourism
- Applied Anthropology
- Cognitive Anthropology
- Cultural Materialism
- Ecological Anthropology
- Feminist Anthropology
- Forensic Anthropology
- Humanistic Anthropology
- Legal Anthropology
- Psychological Anthropology
- Urban Anthropology
- National Traditions
- Roger D. Abrahams
- Arjun Appadurai
- Gregory Bateson
- Roberto Cardoso de Oliveira
- Elizabeth Florence Colson
- Roy Goodwin D’Andrade
- Manuel Gamio
- Clifford Geertz
- Ward H. Goodenough
- Carol Greenhouse
- Jane Guyer
- Bruno Latour
- Eleanor Burke Leacock
- Sidney Mintz
- Barbara Meyerhoff
- Sherry Ortner
- Darrell Posey
- Richard and Sally Price
- Jean Rouch
- Julian Steward
- Victor Turner
- Eric Wolf