skip navigation
Indiana University Bloomington
School of Education, Indiana University Bloomington: Preparing educators, advancing knowledge, improving education
 
Education Home

How to Recognize Plagiarism

Plagiarism Pattern: Dippy Dupe

Definition

A dippy dupe is a word-for-word plagiarist who takes text from another author without proper acknowledgement of his or her words, because quotation marks are missing which would identify what has been taken.

Original Source Material:

Five first principles are elaborated: (a) Learning is promoted when learners are engaged in solving real-world problems. (b) Learning is promoted when existing knowledge is activated as a foundation for new knowledge. (c) Learning is promoted when new knowledge is demonstrated to the learner. (d) Learning is promoted when new knowledge is applied by the learner. (e) Learning is promoted when new knowledge is integrated into the learner’s world.

Source:

Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43-59.

Plagiarized Version: Correct Version: Not plagiarized

Merrill (2002) claims that learning is promoted when students are engaged in solving real-world problems, existing knowledge is activated as a foundation for new knowledge, new knowledge is demonstrated to the learner, new knowledge is applied by the learner, and when new knowledge is integrated into the learner’s world (p. 43).

Reference:

Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43-59.

Merrill (2002) claims that "learning is promoted when students are engaged in solving real-world problems, ... existing knowledge is activated as a foundation for new knowledge, ... new knowledge is demonstrated to the learner, ... new knowledge is applied by the learner, and ... when new knowledge is integrated into the learner’s world" (p. 43).

Reference:

Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43-59.

Explanation: This is word-for-word plagiarism because seven or more words are copied from the source, but quotation marks are missing. There is the full in-text citation, and there is the full bibliographic reference.

Explanation: Merrill is credited by use of quotation marks around his words (punctuation and ellipses added), by the full in-text citation with the locator, and by the full bibliographic reference.

See full list of plagiarism patterns.