Alternating environment in the analysis of derived environment effects

Małgorzata Ćavar

Abstract


In this article it is argued that the so-called derived environment effects can be explained in terms of the alternating environment without reference to the notion of derivation. The notion of the alternating environment refers to the surface sequences of segments across the paradigm, and goes back to Timberlake (1972). In the article, earlier OT approaches are discussed. It is argued that the solution based on the assumption that the stem-particular faithfulness constraints are ranked over general faithfulness constraints, as proposed for example in Pater (1999), cannot be applied to Polish because it is stem consonants that undergo palatalization (and are unfaithful). Another approach, by Lubowicz (1998, 2002) relying on the violation of the local conjunction of the constraint inducing palatalization with Anchor constraint (correspondence of the right-most segment of the stem in the input to the rightmost segment of a syllable in the output) does not cover the whole range of palatalization effects in Polish (as well as in Slovak and Basque). Thus, it is argued that the solution in terms of the alternating environment offers a more general solution to the derived environment effects.

Keywords


optimality theory, morphology, phonology, Polish

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, Stephen, R. 1981. Why Phonology Isn’t ‘Natural’. Linguistic Inquiry, 12(4): 493-539.

Beckman, Jill. 1995. Shona height harmony: Markedness and positional identity. In: J. Beckman, et al. (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18.

Papers in Optimality Theory: 53-76. University of Massachusetts, Amherst: GLSA.

Beckman, Jill. 1997. Positional faithfulness. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Blaho, Silvia (in press). Derived environment effects in Optimality Theory: the case of pre-sonorant voicing in Slovak. Draft, to appear in The Proceedings of FASL 11.

Crowhurst, Megan and Mark S. Hewitt. 1997. Boolean Operations and Constraint Interaction in Optimality Theory. ROA 229-1197. Ms., University of British Columbia, Vancouver and University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

Gussmann, Edmund. 1978. Contrastive Polish-English Consonantal Phonology.

Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

Hualde, J., 1989. The strict cycle condition and noncyclic rules. Linguistic Inquiry, 20: 675-680.

Jakobson, Roman. 1971. The phonemic and grammatical aspects of language in their interrelations. In: Selected Writings II. Pages: 103-114.

Kager, René. 1999. Optimality Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Kiparsky, Paul. 1972. Explanation in phonology. In: Peters, S. (ed), Goals of Linguistic Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Pages: 189-227.

Kiparsky, Paul. 1973. Phonological representations. In: Fujimura, O. (ed.), Three Dimensions of Linguistic Theory. Tokyo, TEC.

Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Explanation in Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

Kiparsky, Paul. 2000. Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review, 17: 351-365.

Łubowicz, Anna. 1998. Derived Environment Effects in OT. ROA 239-0198.

Łubowicz, Anna. 2002. Derived environment effects in Optimality Theory. Lingua, 112: 243-280.

McCarthy, John. 1999. Sympathy and phonological opacity. Phonology, 16: 331-99.

McCarthy, John. 2002. A Thematic Guide to OT. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McCarthy, John and Alan Prince. 1986/1996. Prosodic Morphology. Tech.rept. Rutgers

University Center for Cognitive science, New Brunswick, NJ. Report No. RuCCS-TR-32.

McCarthy, John and Alan Prince, 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In: J. Beckman, et al. (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18.

Papers in Optimality Theory, 249-384. University of Massachusetts, Amherst: GLSA.

Pater, Joe. 1999. Austronesian nasal substitution and other NC effects. In: Kager, R., et al. (eds), Prosody-morphology interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky. 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Tech. rept. Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science, New Brunswick, NJ. Report No. RuCCS-TR-2.

Rubach, Jerzy. 1984.Cyclic and Lexical Phonology. The Structure of Polish. Dordrecht: Foris.

Rubach, Jerzy. 1986. Abstract vowels in three-dimensional phonology: the yers. The Linguistic Review, 5: 247-280.

Rubach, Jerzy. 2000. Backness switch in Russian. Phonology, 17: 36-64.

Rubach, Jerzy. 2003. Duke-of-York Derivations in Polish. Linguistic Inquiry, 34(4): 601-629.

Smolensky, Paul. 1993. Harmony, markedness, and phonological activity. Paper presented at Rutgers Optimality Workshop-1, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. [Rutgers Optimality Archive, http://ruccs.rutgers.edu/roa.html.]


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.